RFV vs. VNMC ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.61

Average Daily Volume

19,639

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

VNMC

Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF

VNMC Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in companies that, at the time of purchase, have market capitalizations either within the capitalization range of the Russell Midcap® Value Index or of $15 billion or less. The Russell Midcap® Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of companies with lower price to book ratios and lower forecasted growth values within the broader Russell Midcap Index®. It may invest up tp 20% of its assets in companies with smaller or larger capitalizations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.26

Average Daily Volume

397

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	VNMC
30 Days	-4.10%	-5.86%
60 Days	-0.38%	-3.66%
90 Days	0.37%	4.39%
12 Months	23.94%	19.19%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in VNMC	Overlap
KMPR	B	1.18%	1.71%	1.18%
PFGC	D	1.59%	1.48%	1.48%
RGA	A	1.12%	2.08%	1.12%
ZION	A	0.87%	1.2%	0.87%

RFV Overweight 84 Positions Relative to VNMC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	B	3.56%
M	C	2.64%
SNX	B	2.62%
AVT	B	2.61%
ARW	B	2.27%
DINO	F	2.24%
X	F	2.14%
LAD	F	1.99%
GT	D	1.98%
AN	A	1.89%
MAN	A	1.83%
MTZ	B	1.8%
JWN	A	1.79%
ADNT	D	1.78%
AA	B	1.74%
USFD	C	1.72%
JLL	C	1.69%
CLF	F	1.55%
GHC	B	1.54%
UNM	A	1.52%
TMHC	D	1.52%
PPC	A	1.5%
THC	A	1.46%
ALLY	B	1.43%
WCC	B	1.42%
R	A	1.38%
LEA	F	1.36%
MDU	A	1.34%
ARMK	B	1.32%
HTZ	F	1.26%
ASB	A	1.22%
PVH	D	1.19%
PAG	D	1.18%
CMC	B	1.13%
PRGO	A	1.09%
JEF	A	1.08%
KD	D	1.06%
WHR	F	1.04%
THO	F	1.02%
CUZ	A	0.99%
FLR	A	0.98%
FNB	A	0.97%
KRC	C	0.92%
HOG	D	0.9%
VAC	C	0.9%
FYBR	B	0.89%
POST	B	0.87%
AR	A	0.85%
UGI	B	0.84%
CHK	B	0.81%
ENOV	F	0.81%
FHN	A	0.8%
PENN	F	0.74%
VLY	F	0.73%
ONB	A	0.72%
GPS	C	0.69%
COHR	C	0.68%
SWX	A	0.67%
PB	B	0.67%
TGNA	C	0.67%
JHG	B	0.67%
GEF	D	0.66%
OSK	D	0.65%
TCBI	A	0.63%
IRT	A	0.62%
AGCO	F	0.62%
BJ	A	0.59%
NVST	F	0.58%
BKH	A	0.55%
NOV	D	0.54%
WBS	F	0.54%
CNO	A	0.54%
VSH	B	0.54%
ORI	A	0.53%
SR	A	0.47%
FAF	F	0.46%
WERN	D	0.46%
BERY	D	0.45%
KNX	F	0.43%
LEG	F	0.35%
CNXC	F	0.34%
NYCB	F	0.34%
UA	F	0.32%
UAA	F	0.32%

RFV Underweight 52 Positions Relative to VNMC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DASH	D	-3.78%
FTI	A	-3.65%
CSTM	D	-3.47%
FANG	B	-3.22%
MPWR	B	-3.02%
NDAQ	B	-3.0%
RCL	A	-2.91%
IQV	D	-2.88%
ALL	B	-2.65%
VMC	C	-2.59%
MRVL	C	-2.43%
CACI	A	-2.33%
CTVA	B	-2.25%
TYL	A	-2.22%
MSCI	F	-2.18%
APO	B	-2.05%
NVT	B	-1.95%
EXR	C	-1.81%
SAIA	F	-1.77%
FLS	A	-1.73%
AVY	B	-1.72%
RRC	B	-1.68%
CDW	F	-1.67%
SKX	A	-1.66%
EGP	F	-1.66%
KOS	F	-1.65%
AXON	B	-1.56%
ALLE	D	-1.45%
A	C	-1.44%
AZEK	C	-1.44%
AVTR	D	-1.42%
RJF	A	-1.37%
BRKR	F	-1.33%
ARES	A	-1.28%
CMA	A	-1.19%
WAL	B	-1.13%
MDB	D	-1.11%
HUBB	D	-1.09%
AAON	A	-1.04%
EFX	C	-1.0%
MSI	B	-0.94%
VRT	A	-0.85%
LULU	F	-0.81%
AME	D	-0.76%
VST	A	-0.76%
ON	D	-0.7%
ULTA	F	-0.69%
FND	C	-0.69%
SITE	F	-0.69%
AZO	D	-0.69%
OTIS	D	-0.47%
AJG	C	-0.42%