RFV vs. TDV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$124.19

Average Daily Volume

6,353

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

TDV

ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF

TDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$75.61

Average Daily Volume

12,090

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	TDV
30 Days	2.19%	-2.66%
60 Days	8.51%	0.44%
90 Days	8.22%	3.93%
12 Months	24.01%	18.47%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in TDV	Overlap
	AVT	C	2.75%	2.86%	2.75%

RFV Overweight 81 Positions Relative to TDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MTZ	B	2.63%
LAD	B	2.6%
SNX	D	2.54%
THC	C	2.29%
JLL	C	2.26%
X	D	2.24%
M	C	2.16%
USFD	B	2.06%
PPC	B	2.01%
ARW	D	1.98%
AA	A	1.95%
JWN	A	1.94%
UNM	A	1.91%
GHC	A	1.83%
PFGC	B	1.83%
AAL	B	1.8%
AN	D	1.77%
TMHC	B	1.74%
WCC	A	1.73%
PBF	D	1.73%
R	A	1.64%
JEF	A	1.61%
GT	C	1.48%
DINO	D	1.48%
ARMK	C	1.47%
MAN	F	1.45%
ASB	A	1.4%
KD	A	1.37%
FLR	B	1.3%
ALLY	C	1.28%
CUZ	B	1.24%
KMPR	A	1.22%
COHR	B	1.22%
FYBR	C	1.21%
RGA	A	1.2%
CMC	B	1.16%
ZION	A	1.13%
PAG	A	1.12%
WHR	A	1.08%
CLF	F	1.06%
FNB	A	1.06%
PVH	C	1.03%
KRC	C	1.02%
THO	B	1.0%
FHN	A	0.98%
VLY	A	0.96%
LEA	F	0.89%
JHG	A	0.87%
ONB	B	0.86%
TCBI	A	0.84%
CNH	D	0.84%
PRGO	C	0.82%
POST	D	0.81%
VAC	B	0.81%
PB	A	0.78%
HOG	D	0.78%
IRT	A	0.73%
UGI	C	0.72%
CNO	A	0.71%
AR	B	0.66%
GEF	A	0.66%
GAP	C	0.65%
BJ	B	0.64%
WBS	A	0.64%
ENOV	C	0.64%
BIO	C	0.62%
SWX	A	0.61%
ORI	A	0.6%
OSK	C	0.57%
NVST	C	0.56%
BKH	A	0.55%
UAA	B	0.49%
FAF	C	0.49%
KNX	B	0.48%
BERY	D	0.48%
SR	A	0.45%
UA	B	0.45%
AGCO	D	0.45%
NOV	D	0.42%
VSH	F	0.39%
CNXC	F	0.24%

RFV Underweight 33 Positions Relative to TDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSGS	A	-3.24%
INTU	A	-3.18%
BMI	B	-3.16%
CASS	B	-3.1%
TXN	C	-3.09%
APH	B	-3.05%
V	A	-3.03%
CGNX	D	-3.03%
ORCL	A	-2.99%
MSI	A	-2.93%
BR	A	-2.9%
POWI	D	-2.9%
LRCX	F	-2.9%
HPQ	B	-2.89%
CSCO	B	-2.88%
MA	A	-2.87%
GLW	B	-2.87%
DLB	D	-2.86%
ROP	C	-2.84%
LFUS	D	-2.81%
AVGO	C	-2.77%
KLAC	F	-2.76%
SSNC	D	-2.75%
ADI	D	-2.72%
MSFT	D	-2.71%
QCOM	F	-2.7%
JKHY	D	-2.68%
ACN	C	-2.67%
AAPL	C	-2.64%
MCHP	F	-2.57%
IBM	D	-2.55%
SWKS	F	-2.55%
CDW	F	-2.53%