RFV vs. SMIG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$111.87

Average Daily Volume

19,639

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SMIG

AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF

SMIG Description

ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by ETF Series Solutions. The fund is co-managed by Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Bahl & Gaynor, Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in dividend paying stocks of companies. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.11

Average Daily Volume

71,742

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	SMIG
30 Days	-4.10%	-1.52%
60 Days	-0.38%	1.50%
90 Days	0.37%	4.10%
12 Months	23.94%	16.00%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in SMIG	Overlap
AVT	B	2.61%	2.09%	2.09%
PAG	D	1.18%	1.16%	1.16%
PRGO	A	1.09%	2.88%	1.09%

RFV Overweight 85 Positions Relative to SMIG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	B	3.56%
M	C	2.64%
SNX	B	2.62%
ARW	B	2.27%
DINO	F	2.24%
X	F	2.14%
LAD	F	1.99%
GT	D	1.98%
AN	A	1.89%
MAN	A	1.83%
MTZ	B	1.8%
JWN	A	1.79%
ADNT	D	1.78%
AA	B	1.74%
USFD	C	1.72%
JLL	C	1.69%
PFGC	D	1.59%
CLF	F	1.55%
GHC	B	1.54%
UNM	A	1.52%
TMHC	D	1.52%
PPC	A	1.5%
THC	A	1.46%
ALLY	B	1.43%
WCC	B	1.42%
R	A	1.38%
LEA	F	1.36%
MDU	A	1.34%
ARMK	B	1.32%
HTZ	F	1.26%
ASB	A	1.22%
PVH	D	1.19%
KMPR	B	1.18%
CMC	B	1.13%
RGA	A	1.12%
JEF	A	1.08%
KD	D	1.06%
WHR	F	1.04%
THO	F	1.02%
CUZ	A	0.99%
FLR	A	0.98%
FNB	A	0.97%
KRC	C	0.92%
HOG	D	0.9%
VAC	C	0.9%
FYBR	B	0.89%
POST	B	0.87%
ZION	A	0.87%
AR	A	0.85%
UGI	B	0.84%
CHK	B	0.81%
ENOV	F	0.81%
FHN	A	0.8%
PENN	F	0.74%
VLY	F	0.73%
ONB	A	0.72%
GPS	C	0.69%
COHR	C	0.68%
SWX	A	0.67%
PB	B	0.67%
TGNA	C	0.67%
JHG	B	0.67%
GEF	D	0.66%
OSK	D	0.65%
TCBI	A	0.63%
IRT	A	0.62%
AGCO	F	0.62%
BJ	A	0.59%
NVST	F	0.58%
BKH	A	0.55%
NOV	D	0.54%
WBS	F	0.54%
CNO	A	0.54%
VSH	B	0.54%
ORI	A	0.53%
SR	A	0.47%
FAF	F	0.46%
WERN	D	0.46%
BERY	D	0.45%
KNX	F	0.43%
LEG	F	0.35%
CNXC	F	0.34%
NYCB	F	0.34%
UA	F	0.32%
UAA	F	0.32%

RFV Underweight 41 Positions Relative to SMIG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BAH	B	-5.17%
HUBB	D	-4.78%
VCTR	A	-4.41%
BR	C	-4.3%
WSO	A	-3.82%
SNA	D	-3.74%
DOX	F	-3.62%
TRGP	B	-3.57%
HIG	D	-3.28%
DGX	A	-3.12%
NI	A	-3.09%
PKG	C	-3.04%
AVY	B	-2.94%
EVR	D	-2.91%
IPAR	F	-2.79%
NTAP	B	-2.44%
AFG	D	-2.41%
LANC	C	-2.25%
ADC	A	-2.25%
HOMB	A	-2.02%
PAGP	B	-1.94%
ATO	A	-1.91%
RPM	C	-1.85%
LNT	A	-1.85%
TRNO	F	-1.8%
CSGS	F	-1.71%
TXRH	A	-1.66%
CAG	A	-1.6%
CBOE	D	-1.59%
AVNT	A	-1.52%
NXST	B	-1.51%
FFBC	A	-1.37%
ELS	D	-1.1%
NSP	D	-1.07%
MTH	A	-0.96%
CMS	A	-0.89%
SON	D	-0.87%
HBAN	A	-0.65%
TSCO	A	-0.55%
USPH	C	-0.54%
IPG	F	-0.34%