RFV vs. HELX ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX)
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$127.10

Average Daily Volume

5,883

Number of Holdings *

82

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
HELX

Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF

HELX Description Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies related to genomic-based technologies designed to enhance the quality of life. Provides access to companies benefitting from or facilitating the use of new research including DNA sequencing, gene editing and personalized medicine Uses bottom-up fundamental research conducted by dedicated, industry-specific analysts to identify disruptive business models at the right stage for investment Actively managed by a seasoned portfolio management team that is based in Silicon Valley and has a long history of investing in the craft of innovation

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.83

Average Daily Volume

2,580

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RFV HELX
30 Days 6.42% -5.99%
60 Days 8.22% -10.44%
90 Days 8.16% -11.92%
12 Months 24.43% 6.42%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RFV Weight in HELX Overlap
BIO C 0.59% 0.59% 0.59%
RFV Overweight 81 Positions Relative to HELX
Symbol Grade Weight
LAD A 2.66%
AVT C 2.59%
MTZ B 2.59%
SNX D 2.39%
JLL D 2.27%
THC D 2.24%
USFD A 2.07%
M F 2.07%
UNM A 2.02%
JWN D 1.98%
X B 1.97%
PPC C 1.96%
AAL B 1.92%
GHC B 1.9%
ARW D 1.9%
PFGC B 1.86%
PBF D 1.79%
AN C 1.79%
AA A 1.78%
WCC B 1.75%
R B 1.74%
TMHC C 1.74%
JEF A 1.7%
DINO D 1.54%
ARMK B 1.48%
GT C 1.43%
MAN F 1.42%
KD B 1.42%
ASB B 1.41%
KMPR A 1.33%
RGA A 1.27%
ALLY C 1.24%
FYBR C 1.23%
CUZ B 1.22%
ZION B 1.18%
CMC B 1.15%
WHR B 1.15%
PAG B 1.15%
FLR B 1.14%
COHR B 1.13%
FNB A 1.11%
FHN A 1.03%
PVH C 1.03%
THO B 1.02%
KRC B 0.99%
VLY B 0.98%
JHG B 0.92%
CLF F 0.92%
TCBI C 0.91%
ONB C 0.89%
LEA F 0.89%
PRGO C 0.84%
POST C 0.82%
PB B 0.82%
VAC C 0.8%
HOG D 0.78%
CNH C 0.78%
IRT A 0.76%
CNO B 0.74%
AR B 0.71%
UGI C 0.71%
GEF A 0.68%
GAP C 0.67%
WBS A 0.67%
SWX B 0.64%
BJ A 0.63%
ENOV C 0.62%
ORI A 0.62%
BKH A 0.59%
OSK C 0.58%
NVST B 0.53%
FAF A 0.52%
KNX C 0.48%
BERY C 0.48%
SR A 0.47%
AGCO D 0.45%
UAA C 0.44%
NOV C 0.42%
UA C 0.41%
VSH F 0.35%
CNXC F 0.23%
RFV Underweight 52 Positions Relative to HELX
Symbol Grade Weight
VRTX D -5.94%
KRYS C -4.7%
NTRA A -4.64%
LLY F -4.63%
REGN F -4.3%
MEDP D -4.07%
TMO F -4.01%
DHR F -3.99%
UTHR C -2.75%
AZN F -2.34%
CDNS B -2.34%
CTVA C -2.29%
CRL D -2.23%
BNTX C -2.21%
A D -2.11%
IONS F -2.1%
INSM C -2.08%
RVTY F -2.01%
ALNY D -1.98%
QGEN D -1.96%
BRKR D -1.94%
SRPT F -1.5%
RARE F -1.46%
RCKT F -1.42%
TWST F -1.27%
LGND C -1.27%
ICLR D -1.25%
EXAS D -1.2%
LH B -1.15%
IQV F -1.08%
RGEN D -1.08%
BEAM D -1.03%
TECH F -1.01%
VYGR F -0.99%
AZTA D -0.95%
NBIX C -0.94%
BBIO F -0.91%
RXRX F -0.69%
MRNA F -0.66%
VCYT B -0.56%
DVAX C -0.53%
NTLA F -0.51%
DOCS C -0.51%
CDMO A -0.51%
CRSP D -0.5%
AVTR F -0.46%
BMY B -0.36%
CRNX C -0.25%
BMRN F -0.2%
ARE F -0.15%
SLP D -0.11%
FDMT F -0.1%
Compare ETFs