PGJ vs. EATZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.99
Average Daily Volume
67,595
51
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$23.71
Average Daily Volume
1,619
24
Performance
| Period | PGJ | EATZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 7.36% | -2.39% |
| 60 Days | 10.93% | -2.03% |
| 90 Days | 21.09% | 3.29% |
| 12 Months | 5.66% | 16.37% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PGJ | Weight in EATZ | Overlap |
|---|
PGJ Overweight 51 Positions Relative to EATZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | B | 8.12% | |
| TCOM | A | 7.97% | |
| YUMC | F | 7.34% | |
| BIDU | C | 7.28% | |
| NTES | C | 5.86% | |
| JD | B | 5.2% | |
| TME | A | 4.85% | |
| BEKE | B | 4.44% | |
| ZTO | B | 4.37% | |
| HTHT | B | 3.65% | |
| BZ | A | 3.49% | |
| VIPS | D | 3.25% | |
| YMM | A | 3.25% | |
| NIO | D | 3.15% | |
| TAL | B | 2.88% | |
| LI | F | 2.31% | |
| IQ | B | 1.51% | |
| QFIN | A | 1.5% | |
| MNSO | B | 0.99% | |
| ATHM | C | 0.98% | |
| XPEV | D | 0.96% | |
| DQ | F | 0.9% | |
| BILI | B | 0.89% | |
| HOLI | D | 0.87% | |
| RLX | B | 0.78% | |
| ATAT | C | 0.62% | |
| CSIQ | F | 0.6% | |
| GOTU | C | 0.58% | |
| MOMO | C | 0.58% | |
| JKS | D | 0.56% | |
| FINV | B | 0.53% | |
| WB | C | 0.47% | |
| ZLAB | F | 0.45% | |
| GDS | C | 0.42% | |
| EH | B | 0.41% | |
| TIGR | D | 0.28% | |
| QD | A | 0.28% | |
| HUYA | B | 0.24% | |
| NOAH | B | 0.24% | |
| SOHU | B | 0.23% | |
| KC | C | 0.15% | |
| VNET | D | 0.14% | |
| LX | D | 0.14% | |
| DADA | D | 0.13% | |
| CAN | F | 0.12% | |
| TUYA | C | 0.12% | |
| DDL | C | 0.11% | |
| API | D | 0.11% | |
| ZH | F | 0.11% | |
| DAO | F | 0.08% | |
| IMAB | F | 0.07% |
PGJ Underweight 24 Positions Relative to EATZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WING | A | -5.82% | |
| CMG | A | -5.53% | |
| DPZ | B | -5.29% | |
| EAT | A | -5.07% | |
| ARCO | C | -4.83% | |
| DIN | F | -4.76% | |
| YUM | C | -4.68% | |
| PTLO | F | -4.43% | |
| CASY | B | -4.16% | |
| BROS | F | -4.08% | |
| DRI | F | -3.67% | |
| MCD | F | -3.66% | |
| ARMK | C | -3.55% | |
| CHUY | F | -3.52% | |
| TXRH | A | -3.37% | |
| SHAK | A | -3.26% | |
| BLMN | F | -2.9% | |
| LOCO | C | -2.68% | |
| USFD | C | -2.67% | |
| SBUX | F | -2.65% | |
| PLAY | D | -2.51% | |
| JACK | F | -2.21% | |
| PBPB | F | -1.48% | |
| BJRI | C | -1.46% |
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
