HAIL vs. EMM ETF Comparison
Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) to Global X Emerging Markets ETF (EMM)
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
HAIL Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Smart Transportation sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.16
Average Daily Volume
2,987
68
EMM
Global X Emerging Markets ETF
EMM Description
EMM seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies believed to be able to achieve and maintain a leading position within their respective country, region, industry, products produce, or services provided. The belief is that emerging markets have the potential for higher levels of growth based on the occurrence of socio-economic changes. Thus, an opportunistic approach to investing in companies considered to be best positioned to benefit from these changes. The funds investable universe is limited to emerging market stocks that meet minimum trading volume and market capitalization requirements. The selection process also considers advantageous-competitive strategies and share-holder beneficial practices and philosophies. The portfolio is constructed using a bottom-up fundamental analysis, subject to a risk management framework. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading. On May 15, 2023, EMM converted from a mutual fund to an actively managed ETF, with $18 million in assets.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.60
Average Daily Volume
6,489
10
Performance
| Period | HAIL | EMM |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.61% | -1.84% |
| 60 Days | 2.82% | -3.41% |
| 90 Days | 2.09% | -4.10% |
| 12 Months | 3.25% | 11.21% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in HAIL | Weight in EMM | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITUB | F | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
HAIL Overweight 67 Positions Relative to EMM
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUR | C | 3.83% | |
| TSLA | B | 3.17% | |
| XPEV | C | 3.04% | |
| ALSN | B | 2.86% | |
| PSNY | F | 2.45% | |
| CMI | A | 2.43% | |
| GM | B | 2.13% | |
| NVDA | C | 2.11% | |
| LI | F | 2.11% | |
| LYFT | C | 2.08% | |
| EH | F | 2.01% | |
| PAR | B | 1.92% | |
| ANSS | B | 1.9% | |
| AMBA | B | 1.84% | |
| BWA | D | 1.81% | |
| NIO | F | 1.8% | |
| UBER | D | 1.76% | |
| CAR | C | 1.7% | |
| GTX | D | 1.62% | |
| ON | D | 1.59% | |
| RIVN | F | 1.56% | |
| GRAB | B | 1.55% | |
| VC | D | 1.55% | |
| AXL | C | 1.52% | |
| AIOT | B | 1.51% | |
| MOD | A | 1.5% | |
| TRMB | B | 1.49% | |
| OUST | C | 1.47% | |
| THRM | D | 1.46% | |
| HEI | B | 1.45% | |
| LCID | F | 1.42% | |
| HMC | F | 1.42% | |
| QCOM | F | 1.37% | |
| REVG | B | 1.34% | |
| APTV | D | 1.3% | |
| IRDM | D | 1.29% | |
| LAZR | F | 1.28% | |
| PCAR | B | 1.28% | |
| MT | B | 1.21% | |
| PLUG | F | 1.21% | |
| ALGM | D | 1.21% | |
| TXT | D | 1.19% | |
| VNT | B | 1.19% | |
| DAN | D | 1.12% | |
| F | C | 1.09% | |
| INDI | C | 1.08% | |
| MVIS | F | 1.07% | |
| BIDU | F | 1.06% | |
| STM | F | 1.03% | |
| TM | D | 1.01% | |
| ST | F | 0.98% | |
| INTC | D | 0.97% | |
| HII | D | 0.95% | |
| LEA | D | 0.95% | |
| NXPI | D | 0.92% | |
| BLDE | D | 0.9% | |
| ASPN | F | 0.89% | |
| BLNK | F | 0.85% | |
| HY | D | 0.83% | |
| BLBD | D | 0.8% | |
| STLA | F | 0.73% | |
| ENPH | F | 0.56% | |
| REKR | F | 0.51% | |
| GOEV | F | 0.48% | |
| ITRN | B | 0.36% | |
| SEDG | F | 0.34% | |
| INVZ | F | 0.33% |
HAIL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EMM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
