GRPM vs. ESGX ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap 400? GARP ETF (GRPM) to Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF (ESGX)

GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400? GARP ETF

GRPM Description

The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the top 60 growth stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® Index with relatively high quality and value composite scores, which are computed pursuant to the index methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$122.23

Average Daily Volume

31,410

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ESGX

Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF

ESGX Description

ESGX invests in US-listed companies determined to have high shareholder value, unencumbered by ESG restrictions, such as political stances or conforming to a greater social goal of stakeholder capitalism. Using a proprietary methodology, the fund assigns stocks with shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The shareholder value creation score considers information on corporate donations, advocacy, activities, and policies gathered from different data sources. The financial metrics score separately calculates a securitys one-year and five-year price performance, closing price, cash, revenue, debt-to-equity ratio, average dividend yield, profit margin, and market capitalization. Companies are ranked according to the highest shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The fund selects and weights 50 companies from the resulting sets of filtered companies. The index is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.79

Average Daily Volume

101

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GRPM	ESGX
30 Days	5.48%	-0.71%
60 Days	4.71%	0.93%
90 Days	3.48%
12 Months	35.73%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in GRPM	Weight in ESGX	Overlap
IBOC	B	1.56%	2.11%	1.56%
KNSL	B	2.43%	1.67%	1.67%
LNTH	D	2.88%	1.52%	1.52%
MANH	D	1.36%	1.97%	1.36%

GRPM Overweight 56 Positions Relative to ESGX

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ROIV	C	2.85%
AAON	B	2.83%
HWC	B	2.63%
BYD	B	2.41%
TXRH	B	2.33%
AIT	B	2.31%
MTDR	B	2.23%
CNX	A	2.19%
AN	C	2.14%
MUSA	B	2.14%
LAD	A	2.02%
EME	A	1.93%
CHRD	D	1.9%
AVT	C	1.86%
TEX	F	1.86%
FIX	A	1.84%
RMBS	B	1.83%
OZK	B	1.82%
EWBC	A	1.81%
CVLT	B	1.76%
HOG	D	1.75%
CIVI	D	1.73%
TOL	B	1.7%
RS	B	1.67%
RNR	C	1.63%
OC	A	1.6%
DINO	D	1.6%
DAR	C	1.54%
VAL	F	1.53%
CMC	B	1.45%
EXP	B	1.45%
CROX	D	1.44%
MEDP	D	1.42%
VC	F	1.41%
KBH	D	1.38%
TMHC	C	1.38%
SSD	F	1.37%
LECO	C	1.33%
CELH	F	1.33%
PAG	B	1.33%
LOPE	C	1.32%
CBT	D	1.32%
PBF	D	1.32%
NFG	A	1.31%
SAIA	B	1.31%
OVV	B	1.3%
BLD	D	1.29%
AMG	B	1.28%
LSCC	D	1.26%
QLYS	B	1.14%
PII	F	1.08%
MUR	D	1.06%
AGCO	D	1.03%
RRC	B	1.0%
PVH	C	0.98%
ARW	D	0.95%

GRPM Underweight 45 Positions Relative to ESGX

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GTLS	A	-2.58%
WST	C	-2.51%
TYL	B	-2.4%
VTRS	A	-2.37%
SEIC	B	-2.33%
NWS	A	-2.33%
RLI	A	-2.33%
VNO	C	-2.3%
GEF	A	-2.27%
TPX	B	-2.26%
JBHT	C	-2.24%
EVRG	A	-2.21%
PNR	A	-2.19%
SLGN	A	-2.17%
VRSN	C	-2.16%
SYY	D	-2.14%
EHC	B	-2.1%
FFIV	B	-2.08%
KIM	A	-2.07%
SYNA	C	-2.06%
PNW	A	-2.06%
TDY	B	-2.05%
DCI	B	-2.04%
DXCM	C	-2.02%
ROL	B	-2.02%
RVTY	F	-1.95%
KEYS	A	-1.92%
FRT	B	-1.91%
LKQ	F	-1.88%
HST	C	-1.88%
MAA	B	-1.85%
STE	D	-1.82%
POOL	C	-1.82%
CNP	A	-1.81%
SWKS	F	-1.81%
O	C	-1.75%
GPC	D	-1.74%
POST	C	-1.73%
WEX	D	-1.7%
MCHP	F	-1.69%
EGP	D	-1.67%
BCO	F	-1.54%
HII	F	-1.45%
QRVO	F	-1.19%
ENPH	F	-1.09%