FTWO vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

FTWO

Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF

FTWO Description

The fund seeks to track the investment results of the index, which measures the performance of companies that are engaged in national security and natural resource security as defined by Bloomberg. The index includes large- and mid-capitalization companies. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund"s total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the FAANG Sectors. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.83

Average Daily Volume

20,044

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$128.90

Average Daily Volume

5,821

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FTWO	RFV
30 Days	-0.69%	8.77%
60 Days	2.91%	9.86%
90 Days	9.74%	10.01%
12 Months	32.13%	26.56%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in FTWO	Weight in RFV	Overlap
	CNH	C	0.75%	0.78%	0.75%

FTWO Overweight 37 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CEG	D	13.94%
DE	A	8.77%
XOM	B	7.66%
FCX	D	4.09%
GE	D	3.99%
CVX	A	3.93%
RTX	C	3.42%
CTVA	C	3.38%
NEM	D	3.1%
LMT	D	2.77%
BWXT	B	2.3%
GOLD	D	1.94%
COP	C	1.88%
BA	F	1.84%
GD	F	1.51%
TDG	D	1.48%
NOC	D	1.4%
CF	B	1.35%
EOG	A	1.1%
LHX	C	1.01%
HWM	A	0.99%
WMB	A	0.96%
SLB	C	0.87%
INGR	B	0.85%
PSX	C	0.79%
MPC	D	0.77%
TTC	D	0.74%
MOS	F	0.73%
RGLD	C	0.61%
FMC	D	0.6%
UEC	B	0.58%
DAR	C	0.56%
DNN	B	0.36%
SMR	B	0.34%
HEI	B	0.33%
HEI	B	0.23%
LEU	C	0.22%

FTWO Underweight 81 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LAD	A	-2.66%
AVT	C	-2.59%
MTZ	B	-2.59%
SNX	C	-2.39%
JLL	D	-2.27%
THC	D	-2.24%
USFD	A	-2.07%
M	D	-2.07%
UNM	A	-2.02%
JWN	C	-1.98%
X	C	-1.97%
PPC	C	-1.96%
AAL	B	-1.92%
GHC	C	-1.9%
ARW	D	-1.9%
PFGC	B	-1.86%
PBF	D	-1.79%
AN	C	-1.79%
AA	B	-1.78%
WCC	B	-1.75%
R	B	-1.74%
TMHC	B	-1.74%
JEF	A	-1.7%
DINO	D	-1.54%
ARMK	B	-1.48%
GT	C	-1.43%
MAN	D	-1.42%
KD	B	-1.42%
ASB	B	-1.41%
KMPR	B	-1.33%
RGA	A	-1.27%
ALLY	C	-1.24%
FYBR	D	-1.23%
CUZ	B	-1.22%
ZION	B	-1.18%
CMC	B	-1.15%
WHR	B	-1.15%
PAG	B	-1.15%
FLR	B	-1.14%
COHR	B	-1.13%
FNB	A	-1.11%
FHN	A	-1.03%
PVH	C	-1.03%
THO	B	-1.02%
KRC	C	-0.99%
VLY	B	-0.98%
JHG	A	-0.92%
CLF	F	-0.92%
TCBI	B	-0.91%
ONB	B	-0.89%
LEA	D	-0.89%
PRGO	B	-0.84%
POST	C	-0.82%
PB	A	-0.82%
VAC	B	-0.8%
HOG	D	-0.78%
IRT	A	-0.76%
CNO	A	-0.74%
AR	B	-0.71%
UGI	A	-0.71%
GEF	A	-0.68%
GAP	C	-0.67%
WBS	A	-0.67%
SWX	B	-0.64%
BJ	A	-0.63%
ENOV	C	-0.62%
ORI	A	-0.62%
BIO	D	-0.59%
BKH	A	-0.59%
OSK	B	-0.58%
NVST	B	-0.53%
FAF	A	-0.52%
KNX	B	-0.48%
BERY	B	-0.48%
SR	A	-0.47%
AGCO	D	-0.45%
UAA	C	-0.44%
NOV	C	-0.42%
UA	C	-0.41%
VSH	D	-0.35%
CNXC	F	-0.23%