ERTH vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.21

Average Daily Volume

9,674

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$131.14

Average Daily Volume

5,821

Number of Holdings *

82

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ERTH RFV
30 Days -0.65% 8.77%
60 Days -4.93% 9.86%
90 Days -3.45% 10.01%
12 Months -2.65% 26.56%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ERTH Weight in RFV Overlap
CUZ B 1.12% 1.22% 1.12%
ERTH Overweight 39 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
TSLA B 7.03%
DLR B 5.84%
NVDA C 5.76%
FSLR F 4.43%
LI F 3.17%
WMS D 2.13%
ENPH F 2.01%
XPEV C 1.85%
RIVN F 1.77%
VNO B 1.58%
BMI B 1.55%
DAR C 1.54%
MTH D 1.53%
NIO F 1.52%
KBH D 1.38%
WFG D 1.2%
ORA B 1.04%
DEI B 0.75%
LCID F 0.58%
RUN F 0.56%
NEP F 0.37%
PLUG F 0.36%
AAT B 0.34%
ARRY C 0.27%
ERII D 0.25%
BZH B 0.23%
BDN C 0.21%
PGRE F 0.21%
SHLS F 0.2%
REX D 0.17%
SEDG F 0.17%
JKS F 0.16%
CHPT F 0.1%
RDUS C 0.1%
TUYA F 0.08%
AMPS C 0.07%
MNTK F 0.06%
MERC F 0.06%
RENB F 0.05%
ERTH Underweight 81 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
LAD A -2.66%
AVT C -2.59%
MTZ B -2.59%
SNX C -2.39%
JLL D -2.27%
THC D -2.24%
USFD A -2.07%
M D -2.07%
UNM A -2.02%
JWN C -1.98%
X C -1.97%
PPC C -1.96%
AAL B -1.92%
GHC C -1.9%
ARW D -1.9%
PFGC B -1.86%
PBF D -1.79%
AN C -1.79%
AA B -1.78%
WCC B -1.75%
R B -1.74%
TMHC B -1.74%
JEF A -1.7%
DINO D -1.54%
ARMK B -1.48%
GT C -1.43%
MAN D -1.42%
KD B -1.42%
ASB B -1.41%
KMPR B -1.33%
RGA A -1.27%
ALLY C -1.24%
FYBR D -1.23%
ZION B -1.18%
CMC B -1.15%
WHR B -1.15%
PAG B -1.15%
FLR B -1.14%
COHR B -1.13%
FNB A -1.11%
FHN A -1.03%
PVH C -1.03%
THO B -1.02%
KRC C -0.99%
VLY B -0.98%
JHG A -0.92%
CLF F -0.92%
TCBI B -0.91%
ONB B -0.89%
LEA D -0.89%
PRGO B -0.84%
POST C -0.82%
PB A -0.82%
VAC B -0.8%
HOG D -0.78%
CNH C -0.78%
IRT A -0.76%
CNO A -0.74%
AR B -0.71%
UGI A -0.71%
GEF A -0.68%
GAP C -0.67%
WBS A -0.67%
SWX B -0.64%
BJ A -0.63%
ENOV C -0.62%
ORI A -0.62%
BIO D -0.59%
BKH A -0.59%
OSK B -0.58%
NVST B -0.53%
FAF A -0.52%
KNX B -0.48%
BERY B -0.48%
SR A -0.47%
AGCO D -0.45%
UAA C -0.44%
NOV C -0.42%
UA C -0.41%
VSH D -0.35%
CNXC F -0.23%
Compare ETFs