EATZ vs. PGJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.38
Average Daily Volume
2,009
19
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$22.73
Average Daily Volume
39,056
53
Performance
| Period | EATZ | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.77% | 2.85% |
| 60 Days | 9.36% | -0.48% |
| 90 Days | 8.00% | -0.86% |
| 12 Months | 38.47% | -7.99% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in PGJ | Overlap |
|---|
EATZ Overweight 19 Positions Relative to PGJ
EATZ Underweight 53 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | B | -9.86% | |
| TCOM | C | -8.36% | |
| YUMC | D | -7.69% | |
| JD | C | -7.36% | |
| BIDU | F | -6.91% | |
| NIO | D | -4.73% | |
| ZTO | C | -4.39% | |
| NTES | F | -4.0% | |
| BEKE | D | -3.79% | |
| VIPS | F | -3.41% | |
| YMM | D | -3.09% | |
| TME | F | -3.07% | |
| HTHT | D | -2.96% | |
| LI | D | -2.62% | |
| BZ | F | -2.46% | |
| QFIN | B | -2.35% | |
| TAL | F | -2.02% | |
| XPEV | C | -1.41% | |
| BILI | C | -1.2% | |
| ATHM | C | -1.2% | |
| GDS | B | -1.03% | |
| ATAT | B | -0.86% | |
| RLX | F | -0.77% | |
| MOMO | D | -0.73% | |
| DQ | D | -0.73% | |
| ZLAB | C | -0.72% | |
| MNSO | D | -0.7% | |
| IQ | F | -0.68% | |
| FINV | C | -0.66% | |
| CSIQ | F | -0.6% | |
| JKS | D | -0.53% | |
| WB | F | -0.44% | |
| SOHU | D | -0.34% | |
| EH | F | -0.32% | |
| TIGR | F | -0.31% | |
| GOTU | F | -0.28% | |
| VNET | C | -0.27% | |
| DDL | C | -0.25% | |
| QD | D | -0.24% | |
| HUYA | D | -0.24% | |
| NOAH | D | -0.2% | |
| RERE | D | -0.19% | |
| LX | C | -0.16% | |
| TUYA | F | -0.11% | |
| KC | F | -0.11% | |
| WDH | F | -0.1% | |
| API | F | -0.1% | |
| DOYU | C | -0.1% | |
| DAO | F | -0.08% | |
| DADA | F | -0.08% | |
| BZUN | C | -0.07% | |
| NIU | F | -0.06% | |
| IMAB | F | -0.05% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
