EATZ vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.05

Average Daily Volume

1,981

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.54

Average Daily Volume

192,044

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EATZ PGJ
30 Days 7.35% -5.37%
60 Days 10.11% 13.12%
90 Days 12.24% 17.78%
12 Months 40.23% 2.29%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EATZ Weight in PGJ Overlap
YUMC C 5.22% 9.52% 5.22%
EATZ Overweight 20 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
EAT A 7.2%
TXRH B 6.48%
BROS A 6.28%
CAKE C 5.82%
WING D 5.36%
LOCO D 4.8%
USFD A 4.77%
ARMK B 4.67%
DIN C 4.64%
PFGC B 4.56%
CASY A 4.45%
DPZ C 4.35%
SYY D 4.33%
DRI B 4.17%
SGBX F 3.94%
STKS F 3.87%
CMG B 2.42%
YUM D 1.63%
MCD D 1.45%
SHAK C 1.44%
EATZ Underweight 53 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU F -6.21%
BEKE D -4.54%
NTES D -3.64%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN A -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
BILI D -1.27%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM C -1.06%
DQ F -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO D -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH D -0.45%
WB D -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL C -0.34%
VNET B -0.28%
QD B -0.27%
LX B -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH D -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC B -0.19%
RERE C -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API B -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA D -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS C -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs