CZA vs. NOBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA) to ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$97.91

Average Daily Volume

6,752

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF

NOBL Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P 500Â® Dividend AristocratsÂ® Index (the "index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$97.62

Average Daily Volume

465,087

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CZA	NOBL
30 Days	-2.66%	-2.21%
60 Days	0.37%	0.50%
90 Days	4.77%	2.69%
12 Months	17.35%	9.27%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CZA	Weight in NOBL	Overlap
AMCR	A	1.06%	1.39%	1.06%
AOS	D	1.0%	1.55%	1.0%
CINF	D	1.48%	1.51%	1.48%
DOV	A	1.9%	1.65%	1.65%
MKC	B	1.57%	1.65%	1.57%

CZA Overweight 90 Positions Relative to NOBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIG	D	2.31%
WAB	A	2.24%
WTW	D	2.13%
GLW	B	2.13%
EQR	A	1.99%
ZBH	D	1.92%
DTE	A	1.83%
ETR	A	1.78%
VLTO	A	1.74%
ES	B	1.72%
STT	C	1.7%
BAX	F	1.64%
HUBB	D	1.62%
WRB	D	1.56%
CHKP	D	1.54%
APTV	D	1.5%
BAH	B	1.47%
J	B	1.42%
LDOS	A	1.38%
JBHT	F	1.36%
CSL	A	1.36%
TDY	D	1.34%
AVY	A	1.34%
WMG	C	1.34%
IEX	D	1.33%
LII	D	1.27%
EG	D	1.26%
SUI	F	1.23%
GGG	D	1.19%
CAG	B	1.15%
TRMB	D	1.14%
RPM	D	1.08%
BAP	C	1.07%
LOGI	D	1.03%
UDR	B	0.99%
ACM	A	0.97%
NI	A	0.97%
CNA	B	0.95%
GLPI	F	0.94%
RNR	D	0.94%
XP	D	0.92%
NVT	A	0.91%
FLEX	D	0.89%
PFGC	D	0.87%
REG	F	0.87%
HII	D	0.86%
RRX	D	0.84%
DOX	F	0.83%
EMN	A	0.83%
SNX	A	0.81%
MOS	F	0.8%
ITT	D	0.8%
QGEN	C	0.77%
UNM	A	0.77%
ALV	A	0.76%
WEX	D	0.76%
REXR	D	0.74%
AIZ	C	0.73%
SKX	A	0.73%
ATR	A	0.72%
WWD	A	0.7%
CACI	A	0.67%
SEIC	C	0.67%
GNTX	D	0.64%
INGR	C	0.58%
ALSN	D	0.53%
RHP	D	0.51%
IVZ	D	0.5%
VNT	D	0.48%
RRR	D	0.48%
G	D	0.47%
ESAB	B	0.47%
LFUS	C	0.46%
KEX	A	0.45%
ESNT	D	0.44%
SON	D	0.44%
ESI	C	0.44%
ZWS	D	0.43%
UGI	C	0.43%
FLO	B	0.41%
AXS	B	0.41%
AMG	C	0.41%
BLCO	F	0.4%
JHG	B	0.4%
MDU	A	0.39%
FELE	D	0.37%
ACT	A	0.36%
CRUS	C	0.36%
FUL	C	0.32%
CPA	C	0.31%

CZA Underweight 61 Positions Relative to NOBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CAT	D	-1.78%
XOM	B	-1.73%
TGT	D	-1.69%
KMB	A	-1.67%
NEE	B	-1.67%
MMM	A	-1.67%
ADM	D	-1.67%
HRL	B	-1.67%
EMR	D	-1.66%
GPC	B	-1.63%
CVX	B	-1.61%
WMT	C	-1.6%
ECL	A	-1.6%
PNR	C	-1.59%
CHD	B	-1.58%
WST	F	-1.58%
LIN	D	-1.58%
CL	A	-1.58%
CTAS	A	-1.58%
GWW	D	-1.57%
LOW	D	-1.56%
GD	A	-1.54%
PG	A	-1.53%
ATO	A	-1.53%
PEP	B	-1.53%
ESS	A	-1.51%
CLX	F	-1.51%
ED	A	-1.51%
BRO	C	-1.51%
IBM	D	-1.51%
KO	A	-1.49%
ADP	D	-1.48%
NDSN	C	-1.48%
SYY	D	-1.47%
ABBV	D	-1.46%
FRT	B	-1.46%
TROW	D	-1.45%
CB	C	-1.44%
SHW	D	-1.44%
NUE	D	-1.43%
CAH	F	-1.42%
BDX	F	-1.42%
AFL	B	-1.41%
ROP	F	-1.4%
FAST	D	-1.4%
SWK	F	-1.39%
ITW	F	-1.39%
O	B	-1.39%
ABT	D	-1.38%
BEN	F	-1.35%
ALB	D	-1.35%
MDT	C	-1.35%
KVUE	D	-1.34%
JNJ	F	-1.33%
PPG	D	-1.32%
SPGI	C	-1.32%
MCD	F	-1.31%
APD	C	-1.3%
SJM	F	-1.3%
EXPD	D	-1.27%
CHRW	C	-1.18%