ZIG vs. RFG ETF Comparison
Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$36.06
Average Daily Volume
5,096
29
RFG
Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF
RFG Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$47.31
Average Daily Volume
52,420
81
Performance
Period | ZIG | RFG |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -4.96% | -6.41% |
60 Days | 0.86% | -1.73% |
90 Days | 4.21% | 12.05% |
12 Months | 32.33% | 33.50% |
ZIG Overweight 26 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
WIRE | A | 4.12% | |
HCC | A | 4.01% | |
VIRT | A | 3.72% | |
MLI | A | 3.61% | |
SM | B | 3.53% | |
AX | A | 3.47% | |
PM | A | 3.43% | |
DDS | B | 3.34% | |
BSM | B | 3.33% | |
ATKR | B | 3.3% | |
PHM | B | 3.3% | |
MHO | D | 3.25% | |
PLTK | B | 3.24% | |
CMC | D | 3.24% | |
CALM | D | 3.22% | |
ARCH | D | 3.21% | |
FHI | D | 3.19% | |
DINO | D | 3.17% | |
MO | A | 3.17% | |
BTU | F | 3.16% | |
MTG | B | 3.16% | |
BKE | D | 3.14% | |
DHI | D | 3.13% | |
CF | D | 3.05% | |
STLD | D | 3.05% | |
NUE | D | 2.98% |
ZIG Underweight 78 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
SWN | B | -2.5% | |
CELH | C | -2.35% | |
DUOL | A | -2.34% | |
VST | A | -2.28% | |
WFRD | B | -2.16% | |
PR | B | -2.13% | |
ELF | D | -2.02% | |
BLD | C | -2.0% | |
FIX | D | -2.0% | |
MEDP | B | -1.88% | |
WING | A | -1.85% | |
TOL | B | -1.76% | |
KNSL | F | -1.75% | |
APPF | B | -1.71% | |
H | C | -1.7% | |
MUSA | B | -1.59% | |
OC | A | -1.53% | |
PK | D | -1.52% | |
EME | A | -1.52% | |
OVV | B | -1.49% | |
RRC | B | -1.49% | |
CHRD | B | -1.47% | |
VAL | D | -1.42% | |
RS | D | -1.41% | |
SSD | D | -1.4% | |
EXP | C | -1.38% | |
CLH | A | -1.35% | |
ONTO | B | -1.3% | |
RMBS | F | -1.3% | |
SAIA | F | -1.27% | |
VVV | C | -1.26% | |
DT | F | -1.24% | |
CIVI | D | -1.21% | |
NVT | B | -1.21% | |
LNTH | A | -1.18% | |
CHDN | A | -1.15% | |
WSM | A | -1.13% | |
TXRH | A | -1.11% | |
NEU | D | -1.1% | |
WLK | B | -1.08% | |
FND | D | -1.07% | |
MTDR | D | -1.03% | |
ESAB | B | -1.01% | |
GTLS | D | -1.01% | |
TPX | C | -0.98% | |
LII | D | -0.97% | |
MANH | F | -0.97% | |
TREX | C | -0.97% | |
CASY | A | -0.96% | |
SKX | A | -0.96% | |
QLYS | D | -0.96% | |
LECO | D | -0.95% | |
EXEL | B | -0.91% | |
PSTG | B | -0.91% | |
LOPE | C | -0.87% | |
PRI | D | -0.85% | |
AIT | D | -0.83% | |
WMS | D | -0.81% | |
OLED | F | -0.8% | |
COKE | C | -0.79% | |
PGNY | F | -0.78% | |
VNT | D | -0.77% | |
WSO | A | -0.76% | |
ARWR | D | -0.73% | |
LNW | D | -0.72% | |
ACHC | D | -0.71% | |
RBC | D | -0.7% | |
GDDY | A | -0.66% | |
PLNT | F | -0.64% | |
FIVE | F | -0.64% | |
BCO | B | -0.64% | |
PEN | D | -0.62% | |
COTY | D | -0.59% | |
BYD | F | -0.56% | |
DBX | F | -0.56% | |
FCN | A | -0.53% | |
HALO | C | -0.51% | |
CAR | F | -0.5% |
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RFG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords