ZIG vs. POWA ETF Comparison
Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA)
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$41.34
Average Daily Volume
3,207
30
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
POWA Description
The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index focuses on companies that have the smallest deviations among their annual gross profit margins over the last five years. The fund will concentrate its investments in securities of issuers in any one industry or group of industries only to the extent that the underlying index reflects a concentration in that industry or group of industries.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$84.33
Average Daily Volume
5,137
48
Performance
| Period | ZIG | POWA |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.37% | -1.23% |
| 60 Days | 8.50% | 0.98% |
| 90 Days | 10.54% | 4.49% |
| 12 Months | 32.35% | 26.87% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ZIG | Weight in POWA | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSN | D | 3.12% | 1.99% | 1.99% |
ZIG Overweight 29 Positions Relative to POWA
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI | A | 5.01% | |
| TPL | A | 4.63% | |
| SYF | A | 3.94% | |
| MLI | B | 3.92% | |
| CALM | A | 3.81% | |
| HCC | B | 3.75% | |
| STLD | B | 3.74% | |
| BTU | B | 3.47% | |
| AMR | C | 3.43% | |
| CRC | B | 3.39% | |
| APAM | A | 3.39% | |
| SLM | A | 3.36% | |
| MO | A | 3.33% | |
| ATKR | C | 3.32% | |
| BK | A | 3.31% | |
| CNS | B | 3.29% | |
| DPZ | C | 3.28% | |
| LPX | A | 3.27% | |
| NUE | D | 3.25% | |
| YUM | D | 3.21% | |
| DDS | B | 3.17% | |
| CF | A | 3.12% | |
| BCC | B | 3.06% | |
| BPOP | C | 2.94% | |
| PBF | D | 2.89% | |
| BLDR | D | 2.76% | |
| STNG | F | 2.38% | |
| CROX | F | 2.26% | |
| TRMD | F | 2.0% |
ZIG Underweight 47 Positions Relative to POWA
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAST | B | -2.35% | |
| ADSK | B | -2.3% | |
| NOW | B | -2.27% | |
| BAH | D | -2.25% | |
| CMI | A | -2.25% | |
| ATR | B | -2.23% | |
| JCI | A | -2.22% | |
| WAT | B | -2.2% | |
| AME | A | -2.2% | |
| ZBRA | B | -2.19% | |
| KR | B | -2.18% | |
| WMT | A | -2.13% | |
| DOV | A | -2.13% | |
| JBHT | B | -2.11% | |
| TSCO | D | -2.07% | |
| LOW | A | -2.07% | |
| OTIS | D | -2.06% | |
| VEEV | C | -2.06% | |
| ACN | C | -2.05% | |
| HEI | A | -2.05% | |
| CAH | B | -2.02% | |
| HD | A | -2.01% | |
| CDNS | B | -2.0% | |
| MSCI | A | -1.97% | |
| COR | B | -1.97% | |
| BBY | C | -1.97% | |
| GEHC | D | -1.97% | |
| COST | B | -1.96% | |
| IRM | D | -1.96% | |
| VRTX | C | -1.95% | |
| ANSS | B | -1.93% | |
| SYY | D | -1.92% | |
| LMT | D | -1.91% | |
| MSFT | D | -1.9% | |
| MCK | A | -1.89% | |
| MTD | F | -1.88% | |
| SNPS | C | -1.88% | |
| ROL | A | -1.87% | |
| STE | D | -1.86% | |
| PEP | F | -1.81% | |
| ZTS | D | -1.79% | |
| XYL | D | -1.75% | |
| ADM | D | -1.73% | |
| IQV | F | -1.72% | |
| HSY | F | -1.72% | |
| LRCX | F | -1.69% | |
| DLTR | F | -1.2% |
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
POWA: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
