XHS vs. FLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$93.48

Average Daily Volume

4,000

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
FLV

American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF

FLV Description The investment seeks long-term capital growth. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of large capitalization companies. The portfolio managers may sell stocks from the fund's portfolio if they believe a stock no longer meets their valuation criteria, a stock's risk parameters outweigh its return opportunity, more attractive alternatives are identified or specific events alter a stock's prospects.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.70

Average Daily Volume

6,138

Number of Holdings *

38

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS FLV
30 Days -1.03% 0.77%
60 Days -3.52% 1.71%
90 Days -5.40% 3.83%
12 Months 9.71% 20.43%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in FLV Overlap
DGX A 2.13% 1.03% 1.03%
HSIC C 1.98% 2.14% 1.98%
UNH B 2.09% 2.28% 2.09%
XHS Overweight 55 Positions Relative to FLV
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS C 2.63%
HQY A 2.56%
RDNT B 2.5%
MCK A 2.46%
GH B 2.36%
PINC B 2.35%
EHC B 2.27%
LH B 2.26%
CAH B 2.24%
SEM B 2.21%
RCM A 2.12%
COR B 2.12%
THC D 2.1%
PRVA C 2.1%
CHE D 2.05%
ENSG C 2.0%
CVS D 1.99%
DVA C 1.98%
ADUS D 1.96%
AMED F 1.95%
PDCO F 1.87%
CI D 1.86%
HUM C 1.84%
HCA F 1.83%
UHS D 1.81%
MOH F 1.79%
USPH B 1.7%
SGRY F 1.67%
CRVL B 1.65%
CNC D 1.63%
ELV F 1.55%
BKD F 1.48%
OMI F 1.48%
NEO C 1.45%
OPCH D 1.45%
MD C 1.41%
AHCO F 1.25%
CLOV D 1.25%
CSTL D 1.24%
LFST B 1.24%
PGNY F 1.21%
ALHC C 1.14%
AMN F 1.06%
ACHC F 1.05%
NHC C 1.02%
ASTH F 1.01%
AGL F 1.01%
PNTG D 0.71%
ACCD D 0.64%
OPK C 0.64%
CYH F 0.63%
CCRN F 0.59%
MODV C 0.52%
FLGT F 0.42%
NRC F 0.31%
XHS Underweight 35 Positions Relative to FLV
Symbol Grade Weight
JNJ C -7.21%
UL D -4.05%
MDT D -3.91%
DUK C -3.81%
ZBH C -3.78%
UPS C -3.57%
NSC B -3.55%
JPM A -3.04%
ADI D -3.03%
TFC A -3.01%
OKE A -2.9%
XOM B -2.85%
BRK.A B -2.54%
ATO A -2.47%
GIS D -2.27%
CSCO B -2.19%
BDX F -2.07%
SCHW B -2.03%
AMT C -2.01%
BK A -1.98%
RGA A -1.92%
KVUE A -1.86%
ALL A -1.85%
BUD F -1.85%
VZ C -1.83%
MDLZ F -1.83%
CAG F -1.81%
FFIV B -1.74%
KMB C -1.7%
GPK C -1.55%
ROK C -1.51%
SNY F -1.5%
RTX D -1.49%
MMC B -1.25%
TTE F -0.94%
Compare ETFs