XHS vs. AGNG ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG)

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.45

Average Daily Volume

4,017

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AGNG

Global X Aging Population ETF

AGNG Description

The investment seeks results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Indxx Global Longevity Thematic Index. The fund invests more than 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to provide exposure to exchange-listed companies in developed markets that facilitate the demographic trend of longer average life spans and the aging of the global population, including but not limited to companies involved in biotechnology, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, senior living facilities and specialized health care services.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.09

Average Daily Volume

8,781

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XHS	AGNG
30 Days	-0.01%	-5.11%
60 Days	-2.53%	-5.78%
90 Days	-4.43%	-5.75%
12 Months	10.84%	17.41%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XHS	Weight in AGNG	Overlap
AGL	F	1.01%	0.09%	0.09%
AMED	F	1.95%	0.28%	0.28%
BKD	F	1.48%	0.22%	0.22%
DVA	C	1.98%	1.15%	1.15%
ENSG	C	2.0%	0.7%	0.7%
NHC	C	1.02%	0.4%	0.4%

XHS Overweight 52 Positions Relative to AGNG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	B	2.63%
HQY	A	2.56%
RDNT	B	2.5%
MCK	A	2.46%
GH	B	2.36%
PINC	B	2.35%
EHC	B	2.27%
LH	B	2.26%
CAH	B	2.24%
SEM	B	2.21%
DGX	A	2.13%
RCM	A	2.12%
COR	B	2.12%
THC	D	2.1%
PRVA	C	2.1%
UNH	B	2.09%
CHE	D	2.05%
CVS	D	1.99%
HSIC	C	1.98%
ADUS	D	1.96%
PDCO	F	1.87%
CI	D	1.86%
HUM	C	1.84%
HCA	F	1.83%
UHS	D	1.81%
MOH	F	1.79%
USPH	B	1.7%
SGRY	F	1.67%
CRVL	B	1.65%
CNC	D	1.63%
ELV	F	1.55%
OMI	F	1.48%
NEO	C	1.45%
OPCH	D	1.45%
MD	C	1.41%
AHCO	F	1.25%
CLOV	D	1.25%
CSTL	D	1.24%
LFST	B	1.24%
PGNY	F	1.21%
ALHC	C	1.14%
AMN	F	1.06%
ACHC	F	1.05%
ASTH	F	1.01%
PNTG	D	0.71%
ACCD	D	0.64%
OPK	C	0.64%
CYH	F	0.63%
CCRN	F	0.59%
MODV	C	0.52%
FLGT	F	0.42%
NRC	F	0.31%

XHS Underweight 42 Positions Relative to AGNG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WELL	A	-4.21%
BSX	A	-3.6%
BMY	B	-3.37%
SYK	B	-3.13%
AMGN	F	-3.1%
MDT	D	-2.96%
LLY	F	-2.93%
JNJ	C	-2.89%
ABBV	F	-2.86%
AZN	F	-2.65%
REGN	F	-2.4%
VTR	B	-2.18%
EW	C	-2.04%
ZBH	C	-1.9%
BGNE	D	-1.58%
PODD	C	-1.56%
UTHR	C	-1.55%
DXCM	C	-1.51%
INCY	C	-1.49%
NBIX	C	-1.04%
EXEL	B	-0.9%
OHI	C	-0.83%
EXAS	D	-0.79%
TFX	F	-0.76%
GKOS	B	-0.58%
HALO	F	-0.58%
AGIO	C	-0.51%
BPMC	B	-0.5%
MMSI	A	-0.5%
MNKD	C	-0.46%
DNLI	D	-0.42%
ITGR	B	-0.38%
EMBC	C	-0.38%
NHI	D	-0.37%
SBRA	C	-0.37%
NVCR	C	-0.33%
LTC	B	-0.33%
TBPH	B	-0.3%
LIVN	F	-0.27%
ACAD	C	-0.27%
ALEC	F	-0.22%
ATEC	C	-0.18%