TMDV vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)

TMDV

ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF

TMDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Russell 3000® Dividend Elite Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by FTSE International Limited, targets companies that are currently members of the Russell 3000 Index, have increased dividend payments each year for at least 35 years, and meet certain liquidity requirements. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.00

Average Daily Volume

438

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$56.93

Average Daily Volume

35,834

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TMDV	XMLV
30 Days	5.67%	6.67%
60 Days	2.86%	4.69%
90 Days	4.11%	6.16%
12 Months	7.10%	14.17%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TMDV	Weight in XMLV	Overlap
BKH	C	1.66%	1.19%	1.19%
NFG	B	1.74%	1.45%	1.45%
ORI	A	1.62%	1.48%	1.48%
SON	B	1.57%	1.14%	1.14%

TMDV Overweight 61 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSL	B	1.78%
ADM	D	1.74%
CWT	C	1.71%
ED	B	1.7%
MKC	C	1.69%
KMB	C	1.68%
UVV	C	1.68%
DOV	B	1.67%
CBSH	B	1.65%
ABM	C	1.65%
PEP	B	1.64%
CL	B	1.64%
CVX	B	1.62%
AWR	C	1.62%
ATO	B	1.62%
MSEX	D	1.61%
HRL	C	1.6%
AFL	A	1.6%
KO	B	1.6%
MMM	A	1.59%
PG	A	1.58%
EMR	B	1.58%
NWN	C	1.58%
APD	C	1.58%
CINF	C	1.57%
GPC	D	1.57%
WMT	A	1.56%
TGT	D	1.56%
NDSN	C	1.55%
FRT	C	1.55%
MSA	B	1.55%
SJW	D	1.53%
RLI	A	1.53%
UGI	C	1.53%
SPGI	B	1.52%
SCL	C	1.51%
BDX	F	1.51%
FUL	B	1.51%
UBSI	C	1.5%
RPM	C	1.49%
TROW	D	1.49%
ADP	B	1.48%
MDT	B	1.48%
GWW	D	1.47%
SWK	D	1.46%
ITW	D	1.45%
PPG	F	1.45%
LANC	D	1.44%
LOW	D	1.44%
SHW	D	1.44%
UHT	D	1.44%
SYY	D	1.42%
MCD	F	1.41%
CLX	F	1.4%
JNJ	D	1.39%
NUE	D	1.35%
ABT	F	1.34%
BEN	F	1.3%
WBA	F	1.22%
LEG	F	0.96%
SOLV	F	0.27%

TMDV Underweight 75 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PNM	D	-1.88%
MDU	B	-1.67%
CACI	B	-1.61%
ATR	C	-1.59%
SEIC	D	-1.58%
TXRH	B	-1.56%
CW	B	-1.52%
DTM	A	-1.45%
NNN	B	-1.43%
BWXT	D	-1.43%
SNX	A	-1.42%
IDA	C	-1.41%
DCI	C	-1.41%
OGE	A	-1.4%
ADC	C	-1.4%
POST	B	-1.39%
NWE	C	-1.38%
INGR	B	-1.38%
NJR	C	-1.37%
CASY	B	-1.36%
AM	A	-1.36%
GLPI	C	-1.35%
KBR	C	-1.34%
MTG	C	-1.32%
ACM	D	-1.31%
CVLT	B	-1.3%
WEN	F	-1.29%
EHC	C	-1.29%
FLO	C	-1.28%
POR	C	-1.28%
AIRC	A	-1.27%
OGS	C	-1.26%
BJ	B	-1.26%
USFD	B	-1.26%
SR	C	-1.26%
WTRG	C	-1.25%
RGA	A	-1.25%
GHC	B	-1.24%
MUSA	B	-1.24%
CHE	F	-1.23%
ALE	B	-1.21%
AVT	B	-1.2%
OHI	C	-1.19%
ESNT	C	-1.19%
MSM	F	-1.19%
SIGI	F	-1.18%
AFG	B	-1.18%
HLI	C	-1.17%
SAIC	C	-1.17%
COLM	B	-1.17%
THG	A	-1.17%
GATX	A	-1.17%
LSTR	C	-1.13%
GNTX	D	-1.13%
DLB	C	-1.12%
NBIX	B	-1.11%
FNF	B	-1.1%
STAG	C	-1.09%
WPC	C	-1.08%
NEU	D	-1.07%
PFGC	C	-1.06%
FR	F	-1.06%
PCH	F	-1.05%
CHH	F	-1.05%
LECO	D	-1.05%
EPR	C	-1.04%
RS	D	-1.04%
BRX	C	-1.04%
ELS	D	-1.04%
EGP	F	-1.03%
FHI	D	-1.02%
PRI	D	-1.0%
WH	F	-0.99%
G	D	-0.97%
WERN	D	-0.94%