RVER vs. MPAY ETF Comparison
Comparison of Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) to Akros Monthly Payout ETF (MPAY)
RVER
Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF
RVER Description
RVER seeks to outperform the S&P 500 Index over all time horizons through a narrow exposure to the US equity market. The fund typically invests in approximately 12 to 30 US-listed stocks of any market capitalization. The portfolio construction starts by screening companies based on valuation metrics such as free cash flow, net income, EBITDA, and revenue. Securities are then assessed using growth factors, including top and bottom-line revenue and net income growth. This analysis seeks to exclude firms with negative outliers and those the sub-adviser believes are likely to miss earnings expectations. The remaining companies are screened based on a review of the number and size of institutional holders. After these three initial screens, the sub-adviser ranks and selects from the remaining companies based on its view of positive price change potential. As an actively managed fund, the sub-adviser has full discretion to make buy, sell, and hold decisions at any time.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.85
Average Daily Volume
5,901
15
MPAY
Akros Monthly Payout ETF
MPAY Description
MPAY seeks to provide potential monthly distributions, which may include return of capital to investors. The index is generally comprised of 50 stocks and 18 ETFs. For the stock component of the index, only those listed on a US exchange and have a market-cap of at least $1 billion may be included. A proprietary algorithm analyzes historical financial and trading data to rank and select stocks based on their excess return factor, which is a formula that gauges whether a stock could outperform future markets. The top 50 stocks are selected to be included. The ETF component of the index aims to cut across different asset classes: mainly foreign equity, broad commodity, gold, Treasurys, bonds, REITs, MBTs, and global infrastructure ETFs. Individual weights are based on a proprietary methodology that incorporates modern portfolio theory principles such as historical covariance, historical mean, historical risk contribution, and cluster analysis. The index is rebalanced monthly and is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.71
Average Daily Volume
709
51
Performance
| Period | RVER | MPAY |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 6.45% | 1.19% |
| 60 Days | 18.26% | 4.61% |
| 90 Days | 22.31% | 9.82% |
| 12 Months | 24.84% |
RVER Underweight 48 Positions Relative to MPAY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | C | -5.94% | |
| MSFT | D | -5.7% | |
| GLDM | C | -3.6% | |
| IAUM | C | -3.36% | |
| LLY | F | -3.04% | |
| WMT | B | -2.21% | |
| TSLA | A | -1.83% | |
| ORCL | A | -1.78% | |
| V | A | -1.77% | |
| COST | C | -1.77% | |
| MA | B | -1.76% | |
| UNH | B | -1.74% | |
| HD | C | -1.74% | |
| ADBE | D | -1.57% | |
| XOM | B | -1.55% | |
| MRK | F | -1.53% | |
| NOW | A | -1.46% | |
| JNJ | D | -1.46% | |
| AMAT | F | -1.45% | |
| ABBV | B | -1.45% | |
| NFLX | A | -1.44% | |
| CRM | B | -1.43% | |
| LOW | C | -1.37% | |
| QCOM | C | -1.36% | |
| ACN | B | -1.34% | |
| CVX | B | -1.32% | |
| KLAC | F | -1.32% | |
| MCD | D | -1.31% | |
| INTU | C | -1.3% | |
| CAT | A | -1.28% | |
| HCA | D | -1.28% | |
| FTNT | B | -1.28% | |
| TJX | D | -1.28% | |
| CSCO | A | -1.28% | |
| PM | C | -1.27% | |
| LIN | D | -1.27% | |
| BKNG | B | -1.26% | |
| PEP | F | -1.25% | |
| NKE | F | -1.25% | |
| ADP | A | -1.24% | |
| AZO | B | -1.24% | |
| ABNB | C | -1.23% | |
| TXN | A | -1.23% | |
| ABT | B | -1.23% | |
| LMT | D | -1.23% | |
| UPS | C | -1.22% | |
| RTX | D | -1.19% | |
| DELL | B | -1.02% |
RVER: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
MPAY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
