RPV vs. PWV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Value (PWV)

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$95.96

Average Daily Volume

141,979

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PWV

PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Value

PWV Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Value Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Large Cap Value IntellidexSM Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to provide capital appreciation while maintaining consistent stylistically accurate exposure. The Style Intellidexes apply a rigorous 10 factor style isolation process to objectively segregate companies into their appropriate investment style and size universe. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$61.40

Average Daily Volume

31,806

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPV	PWV
30 Days	7.28%	4.19%
60 Days	8.82%	5.34%
90 Days	9.23%	6.07%
12 Months	31.28%	30.91%

20 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPV	Weight in PWV	Overlap
AIG	B	0.92%	1.39%	0.92%
BAC	A	1.1%	3.7%	1.1%
BK	A	1.05%	1.59%	1.05%
BRK.A	B	3.71%	3.25%	3.25%
CI	F	1.26%	1.25%	1.25%
CNC	D	1.3%	1.03%	1.03%
COF	B	1.5%	1.77%	1.5%
CVX	A	0.46%	3.52%	0.46%
ELV	F	0.41%	1.02%	0.41%
GM	B	4.89%	1.61%	1.61%
KMI	A	0.63%	1.72%	0.63%
KR	B	1.89%	1.54%	1.54%
MET	A	0.69%	1.51%	0.69%
PNC	B	0.69%	1.6%	0.69%
PRU	A	1.04%	1.47%	1.04%
PSX	C	1.39%	1.32%	1.32%
T	A	0.88%	1.56%	0.88%
VLO	C	1.75%	1.36%	1.36%
VZ	C	0.55%	3.16%	0.55%
WFC	A	1.15%	4.15%	1.15%

RPV Overweight 73 Positions Relative to PWV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UAL	A	4.0%
MHK	D	2.32%
VTRS	A	2.29%
F	C	2.25%
TSN	B	2.22%
C	A	2.17%
CFG	B	2.12%
PARA	C	1.84%
IVZ	B	1.82%
KMX	B	1.51%
BG	F	1.5%
MCK	B	1.5%
SYF	B	1.48%
IP	B	1.47%
SW	A	1.46%
CVS	D	1.45%
WBD	C	1.45%
HPE	B	1.42%
NRG	B	1.39%
TFC	A	1.36%
COR	B	1.35%
MTB	A	1.31%
CAH	B	1.24%
BWA	D	1.21%
BBY	D	1.18%
UHS	D	1.12%
LUV	C	1.07%
L	A	1.02%
HBAN	A	0.99%
RF	A	0.95%
KEY	B	0.93%
STT	A	0.89%
GS	A	0.86%
ADM	D	0.84%
TAP	C	0.82%
WBA	F	0.8%
KHC	F	0.79%
MOS	F	0.77%
HIG	B	0.74%
FITB	A	0.69%
AIZ	A	0.66%
IFF	D	0.64%
CINF	A	0.61%
FOXA	B	0.61%
EQT	B	0.6%
BEN	C	0.6%
EVRG	A	0.58%
ALL	A	0.57%
USB	A	0.56%
CHRW	C	0.55%
TRV	B	0.55%
PNW	B	0.55%
TGT	F	0.53%
SWK	D	0.52%
FDX	B	0.52%
CTVA	C	0.51%
EMN	D	0.51%
HPQ	A	0.5%
PFG	D	0.49%
EG	C	0.49%
SYY	B	0.48%
CAG	D	0.48%
ES	D	0.47%
DOW	F	0.45%
HSIC	B	0.43%
NWSA	B	0.42%
ARE	D	0.42%
LYB	F	0.41%
ALB	C	0.38%
LKQ	D	0.37%
FOX	A	0.31%
HUM	C	0.26%
NWS	A	0.14%

RPV Underweight 29 Positions Relative to PWV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	A	-3.52%
IBM	C	-3.37%
XOM	B	-3.28%
ABT	B	-3.26%
PG	A	-3.16%
TXN	C	-3.13%
JNJ	D	-2.98%
AMGN	D	-2.9%
KO	D	-2.8%
ABBV	D	-2.77%
MS	A	-1.78%
OKE	A	-1.68%
DELL	C	-1.65%
JCI	C	-1.64%
CMI	A	-1.63%
URI	B	-1.58%
LNG	B	-1.57%
CAT	B	-1.52%
LHX	C	-1.48%
ET	A	-1.48%
EOG	A	-1.45%
CB	C	-1.42%
AFL	B	-1.39%
RTX	C	-1.37%
LMT	D	-1.32%
MPC	D	-1.27%
LEN	D	-1.27%
KMB	D	-1.26%
DHI	D	-1.19%