RPG vs. XLK ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) to SPDR Select Sector Fund - Technology (XLK)

RPG

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF

RPG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.88

Average Daily Volume

226,381

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XLK

SPDR Select Sector Fund - Technology

XLK Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in The Technology Select Sector Index. In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy, which means that the fund typically invests in substantially all of the securities represented in the index in approximately the same proportions as the index. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$233.60

Average Daily Volume

3,899,973

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPG	XLK
30 Days	7.68%	2.26%
60 Days	9.95%	5.18%
90 Days	12.78%	4.49%
12 Months	40.40%	27.37%

26 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPG	Weight in XLK	Overlap
AAPL	C	0.69%	14.45%	0.69%
ADBE	C	0.83%	2.41%	0.83%
AMAT	F	1.31%	1.54%	1.31%
AMD	F	1.46%	2.44%	1.46%
ANET	C	2.84%	1.04%	1.04%
AVGO	D	1.48%	4.24%	1.48%
CDNS	B	1.08%	0.88%	0.88%
CRM	B	1.07%	3.39%	1.07%
CRWD	B	2.02%	0.86%	0.86%
FICO	B	1.41%	0.61%	0.61%
FTNT	C	1.41%	0.63%	0.63%
GDDY	A	0.79%	0.28%	0.28%
INTU	C	1.32%	2.06%	1.32%
IT	C	0.75%	0.44%	0.44%
KLAC	D	1.64%	0.91%	0.91%
LRCX	F	0.96%	1.0%	0.96%
MPWR	F	1.6%	0.31%	0.31%
MSFT	F	0.99%	12.88%	0.99%
NOW	A	1.95%	2.25%	1.95%
NVDA	C	5.05%	14.37%	5.05%
ORCL	B	1.4%	3.23%	1.4%
PANW	C	1.8%	1.36%	1.36%
PLTR	B	3.0%	1.34%	1.34%
SMCI	F	0.38%	0.12%	0.12%
SNPS	B	0.86%	0.87%	0.86%
TYL	B	1.07%	0.28%	0.28%

RPG Overweight 40 Positions Relative to XLK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
RCL	A	3.5%
TRGP	B	2.8%
KKR	A	2.65%
BKNG	A	2.51%
AXON	A	2.33%
VST	B	2.2%
META	D	2.08%
LYV	A	2.07%
UBER	D	1.96%
PHM	D	1.92%
MAR	B	1.84%
DECK	A	1.78%
URI	B	1.77%
HLT	A	1.77%
BLDR	D	1.75%
TSLA	B	1.68%
DHI	D	1.62%
ACGL	D	1.51%
EXPE	B	1.49%
NCLH	B	1.44%
CMG	B	1.38%
CPRT	A	1.36%
FANG	D	1.33%
NVR	D	1.33%
AMZN	C	1.29%
NFLX	A	1.27%
CPAY	A	1.15%
FTV	C	1.02%
LLY	F	0.94%
ODFL	B	0.93%
HES	B	0.92%
WYNN	D	0.9%
GOOGL	C	0.85%
ROST	C	0.83%
LULU	C	0.83%
APA	D	0.79%
TDG	D	0.79%
WST	C	0.75%
CE	F	0.75%
GOOG	C	0.72%

RPG Underweight 42 Positions Relative to XLK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSCO	B	-2.51%
ACN	C	-2.4%
IBM	C	-2.08%
TXN	C	-2.06%
QCOM	F	-1.99%
MU	D	-1.17%
INTC	D	-1.15%
ADI	D	-1.13%
APH	A	-0.91%
MSI	B	-0.89%
ADSK	A	-0.71%
ROP	B	-0.64%
NXPI	D	-0.61%
DELL	C	-0.43%
CTSH	B	-0.41%
HPQ	B	-0.4%
GLW	B	-0.39%
MCHP	D	-0.38%
ANSS	B	-0.32%
ON	D	-0.31%
HPE	B	-0.3%
KEYS	A	-0.29%
NTAP	C	-0.27%
CDW	F	-0.26%
PTC	A	-0.25%
TDY	B	-0.24%
FSLR	F	-0.23%
WDC	D	-0.23%
ZBRA	B	-0.22%
STX	D	-0.22%
TRMB	B	-0.19%
TER	D	-0.18%
GEN	B	-0.17%
JBL	B	-0.16%
VRSN	F	-0.16%
SWKS	F	-0.15%
FFIV	B	-0.15%
AKAM	D	-0.14%
EPAM	C	-0.14%
JNPR	F	-0.13%
ENPH	F	-0.09%
QRVO	F	-0.07%