RFV vs. PSCM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio (PSCM)
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.58

Average Daily Volume

20,837

Number of Holdings *

88

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PSCM

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio

PSCM Description The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Materials Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US basic materials companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$75.63

Average Daily Volume

1,430

Number of Holdings *

31

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RFV PSCM
30 Days -5.62% -1.50%
60 Days 0.88% 1.08%
90 Days -0.93% 6.14%
12 Months 21.94% 16.47%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RFV Weight in PSCM Overlap
RFV Overweight 88 Positions Relative to PSCM
Symbol Grade Weight
PBF A 3.52%
M D 2.7%
SNX A 2.56%
AVT A 2.5%
X F 2.28%
DINO C 2.24%
ARW B 2.2%
LAD D 2.01%
GT D 1.96%
MAN B 1.83%
CLF D 1.81%
AN A 1.79%
JWN B 1.75%
MTZ B 1.71%
USFD C 1.71%
AA A 1.7%
ADNT D 1.7%
JLL C 1.67%
PFGC D 1.62%
HTZ F 1.58%
UNM B 1.56%
GHC C 1.53%
PPC A 1.51%
ALLY A 1.47%
TMHC B 1.47%
WCC D 1.42%
THC B 1.41%
LEA C 1.35%
ARMK A 1.33%
MDU A 1.31%
R A 1.23%
ASB A 1.2%
KMPR B 1.19%
PVH D 1.17%
WHR F 1.15%
CMC C 1.15%
PAG C 1.14%
RGA A 1.12%
JEF B 1.09%
KD D 1.08%
HOG D 1.01%
PRGO B 1.01%
THO D 1.01%
FNB B 0.97%
CUZ B 0.96%
FLR A 0.95%
VAC B 0.92%
KRC D 0.91%
ZION B 0.88%
POST A 0.85%
UGI B 0.84%
FYBR B 0.83%
ENOV C 0.82%
VLY F 0.82%
FHN B 0.82%
CHK A 0.78%
AR A 0.76%
PENN F 0.74%
ONB B 0.72%
TGNA F 0.69%
JHG C 0.68%
GPS D 0.68%
OSK B 0.67%
PB B 0.67%
GEF D 0.67%
SWX A 0.67%
TCBI D 0.65%
AGCO B 0.63%
COHR D 0.63%
IRT B 0.62%
NVST F 0.58%
BJ A 0.58%
WBS D 0.57%
BKH B 0.55%
CNO B 0.54%
ORI A 0.54%
NOV B 0.52%
VSH D 0.5%
FAF F 0.49%
WERN F 0.48%
SR A 0.47%
BERY D 0.45%
KNX F 0.44%
NYCB F 0.39%
LEG D 0.35%
CNXC F 0.34%
UAA D 0.32%
UA D 0.32%
RFV Underweight 31 Positions Relative to PSCM
Symbol Grade Weight
ATI A -9.33%
SEE D -6.65%
BCPC D -6.55%
AMR D -5.92%
FUL D -5.86%
CRS A -5.56%
HCC A -5.27%
ARCH B -4.46%
IOSP D -4.4%
SXT A -4.35%
KWR C -3.83%
MTRN C -3.62%
MTX B -3.42%
OI D -3.39%
SLVM A -3.22%
SCL D -2.61%
NGVT B -2.38%
HWKN A -2.11%
KALU A -2.08%
KOP D -1.65%
MATV A -1.43%
WS F -1.39%
CENX A -1.35%
SXC D -1.3%
MYE A -1.2%
HAYN A -1.13%
ASIX F -1.03%
CLW B -0.98%
ZEUS D -0.98%
MERC A -0.66%
CMP F -0.63%
Compare ETFs