QVAL vs. IPDP ETF Comparison
Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP)
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$43.16
Average Daily Volume
23,579
49
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
IPDP Description
The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$17.87
Average Daily Volume
1,314
49
Performance
| Period | QVAL | IPDP |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -3.68% | -3.61% |
| 60 Days | 3.00% | -0.36% |
| 90 Days | 6.31% | 3.49% |
| 12 Months | 39.09% | 29.12% |
QVAL Overweight 46 Positions Relative to IPDP
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTHR | A | 2.2% | |
| THC | A | 2.13% | |
| KBH | B | 2.03% | |
| BG | C | 2.02% | |
| CMCSA | F | 2.02% | |
| TEX | D | 2.02% | |
| T | C | 2.02% | |
| MO | A | 2.02% | |
| UHS | C | 2.02% | |
| TOL | C | 2.01% | |
| IPG | F | 2.01% | |
| CRI | F | 2.01% | |
| MTCH | D | 2.01% | |
| INSW | A | 2.01% | |
| GPK | C | 2.01% | |
| OMC | B | 2.01% | |
| PVH | D | 2.01% | |
| ULTA | F | 2.01% | |
| ALSN | D | 2.01% | |
| MOH | F | 2.01% | |
| TMHC | C | 2.0% | |
| UFPI | C | 2.0% | |
| OC | A | 2.0% | |
| AMR | D | 1.99% | |
| ATKR | B | 1.99% | |
| HPQ | D | 1.99% | |
| AGCO | F | 1.98% | |
| ARW | B | 1.98% | |
| ANF | C | 1.98% | |
| LEA | F | 1.98% | |
| DINO | F | 1.98% | |
| ARCH | D | 1.97% | |
| CROX | D | 1.97% | |
| BBY | D | 1.96% | |
| SIG | C | 1.95% | |
| JBL | F | 1.95% | |
| PBF | C | 1.95% | |
| VLO | C | 1.95% | |
| SM | B | 1.94% | |
| CRC | F | 1.94% | |
| CEIX | F | 1.94% | |
| WFRD | B | 1.93% | |
| APA | F | 1.93% | |
| HAL | F | 1.93% | |
| LBRT | B | 1.89% | |
| CVI | F | 1.88% |
QVAL Underweight 46 Positions Relative to IPDP
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN | A | -2.5% | |
| AVGO | D | -2.41% | |
| APOG | A | -2.38% | |
| APH | A | -2.37% | |
| TT | A | -2.36% | |
| DOV | A | -2.33% | |
| HIG | D | -2.32% | |
| QCOM | A | -2.26% | |
| TRV | C | -2.23% | |
| KLAC | B | -2.22% | |
| DCI | B | -2.16% | |
| ITT | D | -2.15% | |
| CTAS | A | -2.15% | |
| RGA | A | -2.15% | |
| HI | F | -2.15% | |
| MCK | C | -2.14% | |
| GWW | D | -2.13% | |
| A | C | -2.13% | |
| GPC | B | -2.09% | |
| SYK | D | -2.07% | |
| SEIC | C | -2.04% | |
| SHW | D | -2.02% | |
| BRC | B | -2.01% | |
| FAST | D | -2.01% | |
| AIT | C | -1.98% | |
| MSI | A | -1.97% | |
| AOS | D | -1.96% | |
| HD | D | -1.94% | |
| CSX | D | -1.94% | |
| ABM | B | -1.92% | |
| ADP | D | -1.91% | |
| ABT | D | -1.89% | |
| PAYX | D | -1.87% | |
| WTS | C | -1.85% | |
| ROK | F | -1.81% | |
| MMC | D | -1.81% | |
| CAH | F | -1.8% | |
| UPS | F | -1.79% | |
| JNJ | F | -1.77% | |
| NSP | D | -1.76% | |
| CHE | F | -1.75% | |
| ACN | F | -1.69% | |
| UNH | C | -1.64% | |
| AAPL | C | -1.6% | |
| GL | F | -1.15% | |
| HUM | F | -1.08% |
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
IPDP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
