PGJ vs. FCLD ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD)

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.18

Average Daily Volume

52,428

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FCLD

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF

FCLD Description

The fund seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index. Normally investing at least 80% of assets in securities included in the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index and in depositary receipts representing securities included in the index. The Fidelity Cloud Computing Index is designed to reflect the performance of a global universe of companies across the market capitalization spectrum that provide products or services enabling the increased adoption of cloud computing, characterized by the delivery of computing services over the internet

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.44

Average Daily Volume

21,666

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PGJ	FCLD
30 Days	-10.97%	-5.41%
60 Days	2.72%	2.53%
90 Days	-2.14%	-6.95%
12 Months	-8.49%	23.25%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in PGJ	Weight in FCLD	Overlap

PGJ Overweight 51 Positions Relative to FCLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TCOM	D	8.63%
BABA	F	8.39%
BIDU	F	6.64%
YUMC	F	6.54%
NTES	D	5.94%
TME	C	5.63%
JD	D	5.38%
ZTO	C	4.86%
BEKE	D	4.71%
BZ	B	3.72%
YMM	B	3.49%
HTHT	F	3.38%
VIPS	F	3.31%
NIO	F	3.21%
TAL	F	2.65%
LI	F	1.67%
QFIN	B	1.67%
IQ	F	1.28%
BILI	B	1.11%
ATHM	C	1.08%
MNSO	F	0.94%
XPEV	F	0.92%
DQ	F	0.84%
HOLI	D	0.79%
RLX	F	0.77%
ATAT	C	0.67%
CSIQ	D	0.64%
MOMO	C	0.61%
JKS	F	0.57%
ZLAB	C	0.56%
FINV	C	0.55%
GOTU	D	0.46%
WB	D	0.46%
GDS	C	0.46%
TIGR	C	0.35%
EH	F	0.32%
SOHU	B	0.26%
HUYA	D	0.24%
QD	D	0.21%
NOAH	D	0.21%
VNET	C	0.18%
DDL	C	0.16%
CAN	C	0.16%
KC	F	0.14%
LX	F	0.14%
TUYA	F	0.13%
DOYU	B	0.11%
API	F	0.11%
DADA	F	0.09%
IMAB	C	0.08%
DAO	F	0.08%

PGJ Underweight 45 Positions Relative to FCLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	A	-6.03%
MSFT	A	-5.35%
INTU	C	-4.45%
NOW	C	-4.43%
CRM	D	-3.75%
HPE	B	-3.31%
EQIX	C	-3.27%
NTAP	B	-3.25%
DLR	B	-3.14%
WDC	B	-3.06%
MSTR	C	-2.97%
SMCI	C	-2.9%
PSTG	B	-2.78%
DDOG	C	-2.65%
HUBS	D	-2.58%
STX	B	-2.54%
WDAY	D	-2.43%
SNOW	F	-2.32%
TEAM	F	-2.13%
XRX	F	-2.06%
ZM	F	-1.86%
NTNX	D	-1.85%
DT	F	-1.83%
TWLO	F	-1.75%
CVLT	A	-1.7%
ESTC	C	-1.64%
DBX	F	-1.41%
MDB	F	-1.4%
CFLT	F	-1.39%
DAY	F	-1.39%
BOX	D	-1.36%
VRNT	C	-1.25%
TDC	D	-1.19%
PEGA	D	-1.08%
VERX	B	-1.05%
RNG	F	-1.05%
AI	C	-1.03%
DOCN	C	-1.0%
FROG	F	-1.0%
GTLB	F	-0.99%
FIVN	F	-0.98%
PATH	F	-0.9%
INFA	C	-0.86%
SWI	B	-0.72%
FSLY	F	-0.52%