PCIG vs. PGJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
PCIG
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
PCIG Description
PCIG aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the global ex-US equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-35 large-cap growth companies with a sustainable edge like consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to period review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$9.46
Average Daily Volume
5,619
10
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.54
Average Daily Volume
192,476
54
Performance
| Period | PCIG | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.52% | -5.37% |
| 60 Days | -4.25% | 13.12% |
| 90 Days | -4.83% | 17.78% |
| 12 Months | 2.29% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PCIG | Weight in PGJ | Overlap |
|---|
PCIG Underweight 54 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | C | -9.52% | |
| TCOM | B | -8.84% | |
| JD | D | -8.37% | |
| BABA | D | -7.56% | |
| BIDU | F | -6.21% | |
| BEKE | D | -4.54% | |
| NTES | D | -3.64% | |
| TME | D | -3.6% | |
| ZTO | F | -3.39% | |
| NIO | F | -3.36% | |
| VIPS | F | -3.32% | |
| HTHT | D | -3.26% | |
| YMM | C | -3.11% | |
| LI | F | -2.65% | |
| BZ | F | -2.57% | |
| QFIN | A | -2.33% | |
| TAL | F | -2.25% | |
| XPEV | C | -1.55% | |
| GDS | C | -1.34% | |
| BILI | D | -1.27% | |
| ATAT | C | -1.18% | |
| ATHM | C | -1.06% | |
| DQ | F | -0.87% | |
| ZLAB | C | -0.77% | |
| MOMO | D | -0.68% | |
| RLX | C | -0.67% | |
| IQ | F | -0.67% | |
| FINV | B | -0.65% | |
| MNSO | D | -0.53% | |
| JKS | F | -0.48% | |
| CSIQ | F | -0.45% | |
| EH | D | -0.45% | |
| WB | D | -0.44% | |
| TIGR | D | -0.43% | |
| DDL | C | -0.34% | |
| VNET | B | -0.28% | |
| QD | B | -0.27% | |
| LX | B | -0.26% | |
| SOHU | F | -0.25% | |
| NOAH | D | -0.24% | |
| GOTU | F | -0.23% | |
| KC | B | -0.19% | |
| RERE | C | -0.18% | |
| HUYA | F | -0.17% | |
| API | B | -0.15% | |
| DAO | B | -0.11% | |
| DOYU | C | -0.11% | |
| TUYA | D | -0.11% | |
| WDH | F | -0.1% | |
| DADA | F | -0.09% | |
| BZUN | F | -0.07% | |
| CAAS | C | -0.07% | |
| NIU | F | -0.06% | |
| CBAT | F | -0.05% |
PCIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
