NBSM vs. XMHQ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)
NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description

NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.37

Average Daily Volume

11,663

Number of Holdings *

46

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.30

Average Daily Volume

310,805

Number of Holdings *

76

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period NBSM XMHQ
30 Days 4.00% 3.12%
60 Days 4.33% 3.51%
90 Days 4.56% 3.55%
12 Months 28.09%
11 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in NBSM Weight in XMHQ Overlap
CHE D 2.41% 1.3% 1.3%
CNM D 0.99% 1.2% 0.99%
CR A 2.09% 1.44% 1.44%
CVLT B 0.51% 1.38% 0.51%
EXP B 3.88% 1.45% 1.45%
GGG B 2.04% 2.05% 2.04%
LECO C 1.99% 2.08% 1.99%
LSCC D 1.77% 1.09% 1.09%
MANH D 1.16% 4.08% 1.16%
RLI A 2.33% 1.1% 1.1%
SSD F 1.37% 1.01% 1.01%
NBSM Overweight 35 Positions Relative to XMHQ
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B 4.27%
KEX B 3.67%
WSO A 3.19%
ITT A 3.11%
VMI B 3.11%
RYAN A 3.08%
ATR B 2.93%
RBC A 2.92%
HAE C 2.9%
TYL B 2.72%
CNX A 2.68%
TTEK F 2.46%
CBU B 2.21%
MKSI C 2.17%
TTC C 2.12%
LFUS D 1.99%
TXRH B 1.94%
ENTG D 1.88%
CFR B 1.86%
TECH F 1.81%
NXST C 1.77%
POWI F 1.59%
TDW F 1.59%
PB B 1.59%
TSCO D 1.59%
BSY F 1.54%
SPSC D 1.51%
CHD A 1.51%
LNT A 1.49%
ROL B 1.46%
ICLR D 1.21%
IBP D 1.15%
BFAM D 1.14%
FND D 1.09%
AWI A 1.04%
NBSM Underweight 65 Positions Relative to XMHQ
Symbol Grade Weight
CSL C -3.86%
EME A -3.81%
WSM C -3.43%
FIX A -2.48%
THC D -2.39%
RS B -2.38%
RNR C -2.28%
OC A -2.16%
TOL B -2.03%
PSTG D -1.86%
CW C -1.83%
KNSL B -1.8%
DT D -1.66%
MEDP D -1.62%
BLD D -1.59%
DKS D -1.57%
MUSA B -1.43%
AYI B -1.43%
AIT B -1.4%
PRI B -1.35%
WMS F -1.34%
INGR C -1.32%
AFG A -1.3%
RGLD C -1.3%
TREX C -1.3%
SEIC B -1.28%
PCTY C -1.22%
UFPI C -1.21%
CELH F -1.13%
LSTR D -1.13%
DCI B -1.12%
SAIC F -1.03%
CROX D -1.02%
WFRD D -0.96%
QLYS B -0.94%
LNTH D -0.94%
G B -0.94%
ELF C -0.93%
VNT C -0.91%
COKE C -0.9%
ROIV C -0.9%
CHX C -0.88%
DINO D -0.87%
KBH D -0.85%
MSA F -0.84%
CBT D -0.82%
MTG C -0.81%
VVV D -0.8%
ESNT F -0.74%
EXPO D -0.74%
CRUS D -0.66%
MSM C -0.66%
LOPE C -0.64%
NEU D -0.6%
LANC C -0.52%
FHI B -0.51%
IBOC B -0.49%
ENS F -0.49%
TEX F -0.48%
SAM C -0.48%
YETI D -0.48%
NSP F -0.47%
VC F -0.39%
CXT C -0.35%
CRI F -0.32%
Compare ETFs