MVFD vs. CPAI ETF Comparison

Comparison of Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) to Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)
MVFD

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF

MVFD Description

MVFD focuses on equities demonstrating strong cash flow and dividend potential, shifting towards fixed income ETFs linked to US Treasurys in unfavorable cash flow scenarios. The fund seeks to mirror the performance of its target index, comprised of 40 equally weighted stocks selected for their financial health and income-producing ability, alongside up to 5 fixed income ETFs. Driving its selection process is the proprietary Volume Factor methodology, which examines stocks by analyzing the dynamics between market volume and price. This analysis is facilitated by a distinctive volume-price confirmation indicator. Evaluating a broad pool of 3,000 U.S. stocks, the methodology generates a composite score to rank and ensure that only the top-performing equities under positive financial conditions are chosen. MVFDs strategy aims for adaptability, modifying its equity-to-fixed income ratio based on prevailing financial trends. Furthermore, the index undergoes quarterly reconstitution to realign with market changes, optimizing the funds portfolio composition accordingly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.16

Average Daily Volume

4,197

Number of Holdings *

39

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.56

Average Daily Volume

5,708

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MVFD CPAI
30 Days -0.83% 1.52%
60 Days 0.27% 4.82%
90 Days 5.71% 11.66%
12 Months
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MVFD Weight in CPAI Overlap
NYT A 2.86% 1.99% 1.99%
MVFD Overweight 38 Positions Relative to CPAI
Symbol Grade Weight
MO A 3.42%
FOX A 3.32%
TGNA B 3.3%
FOXA A 3.2%
HLNE A 3.18%
ADTN B 3.08%
VOYA B 3.05%
BKH D 3.04%
QCOM D 2.91%
ABM B 2.85%
JHG A 2.69%
MATX A 2.58%
EXPD D 2.55%
SR D 2.55%
MLI A 2.54%
AMKR F 2.53%
CCK B 2.42%
PM A 2.41%
MEI F 2.41%
WKC D 2.32%
AFL D 2.31%
GILD A 2.27%
RHI C 2.25%
WD C 2.24%
CL F 2.23%
NTAP D 2.22%
CHRD F 2.22%
CME B 2.14%
LPX D 2.13%
SSNC D 2.09%
SEM B 2.08%
ADM F 2.07%
ALLY F 2.04%
EXPI B 2.02%
TTC F 1.99%
NRG B 1.98%
KBH D 1.96%
BCO D 1.96%
MVFD Underweight 49 Positions Relative to CPAI
Symbol Grade Weight
TDS B -2.39%
TRGP A -2.25%
SKYW A -2.23%
IAG B -2.19%
SFM A -2.19%
CLBT A -2.17%
CARG B -2.14%
EQH B -2.14%
OKE B -2.12%
UNM A -2.09%
BRBR A -2.09%
LDOS A -2.09%
FTI B -2.07%
COR A -2.07%
RTX C -2.06%
GDDY A -2.05%
MSI B -2.05%
ORCL B -2.04%
FTDR B -2.04%
LLY F -2.04%
NTGR A -2.03%
META B -2.02%
WES D -2.0%
CAH B -2.0%
GOOGL A -2.0%
PRM A -2.0%
WBA C -2.0%
MSFT D -1.99%
CNO A -1.99%
PBI A -1.99%
AAPL C -1.99%
VIRT A -1.99%
GNW D -1.98%
LESL F -1.94%
ACIW C -1.94%
PAA D -1.93%
PAGP D -1.92%
HTZ F -1.92%
TJX D -1.92%
BRC D -1.91%
PGR D -1.91%
ROST F -1.89%
ZIM A -1.85%
MHO D -1.85%
HCA D -1.79%
CVLT B -1.76%
UHS D -1.73%
THC C -1.71%
AGL F -1.41%
Compare ETFs