MVFD vs. BDIV ETF Comparison
Comparison of Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) to AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV)
MVFD
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF
MVFD Description
MVFD focuses on equities demonstrating strong cash flow and dividend potential, shifting towards fixed income ETFs linked to US Treasurys in unfavorable cash flow scenarios. The fund seeks to mirror the performance of its target index, comprised of 40 equally weighted stocks selected for their financial health and income-producing ability, alongside up to 5 fixed income ETFs. Driving its selection process is the proprietary Volume Factor methodology, which examines stocks by analyzing the dynamics between market volume and price. This analysis is facilitated by a distinctive volume-price confirmation indicator. Evaluating a broad pool of 3,000 U.S. stocks, the methodology generates a composite score to rank and ensure that only the top-performing equities under positive financial conditions are chosen. MVFDs strategy aims for adaptability, modifying its equity-to-fixed income ratio based on prevailing financial trends. Furthermore, the index undergoes quarterly reconstitution to realign with market changes, optimizing the funds portfolio composition accordingly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.52
Average Daily Volume
6,200
39
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
BDIV Description
The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities that pay dividends. The fund manager attempts to achieve a faster dividend growth than the market, with a lower portfolio beta, and an aggregate yield that is equal to or greater than the S&P 500®.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$20.33
Average Daily Volume
1,536
35
Performance
| Period | MVFD | BDIV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.81% | 0.99% |
| 60 Days | 6.09% | 2.99% |
| 90 Days | 7.28% | 4.99% |
| 12 Months |
MVFD Overweight 37 Positions Relative to BDIV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MO | A | 3.74% | |
| FOX | A | 3.57% | |
| TGNA | B | 3.47% | |
| FOXA | A | 3.36% | |
| HLNE | B | 3.3% | |
| BKH | A | 3.08% | |
| VOYA | B | 3.0% | |
| JHG | B | 2.92% | |
| MATX | C | 2.88% | |
| ADTN | A | 2.85% | |
| ABM | B | 2.85% | |
| QCOM | F | 2.71% | |
| MLI | B | 2.7% | |
| NYT | D | 2.62% | |
| SR | A | 2.59% | |
| EXPD | C | 2.47% | |
| LPX | B | 2.35% | |
| RHI | C | 2.35% | |
| WKC | C | 2.35% | |
| MEI | F | 2.33% | |
| SEM | B | 2.31% | |
| AFL | B | 2.27% | |
| CCK | D | 2.23% | |
| GILD | C | 2.18% | |
| CHRD | D | 2.17% | |
| NTAP | C | 2.14% | |
| CL | D | 2.13% | |
| SSNC | B | 2.12% | |
| AMKR | D | 2.08% | |
| WD | D | 2.05% | |
| NRG | B | 2.04% | |
| ALLY | C | 2.04% | |
| TTC | C | 1.93% | |
| EXPI | D | 1.9% | |
| KBH | D | 1.87% | |
| ADM | D | 1.86% | |
| BCO | F | 1.7% |
MVFD Underweight 33 Positions Relative to BDIV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | D | -7.46% | |
| AAPL | C | -5.73% | |
| TT | A | -4.48% | |
| UNH | B | -4.14% | |
| ORCL | A | -3.67% | |
| CVX | A | -3.55% | |
| JPM | A | -3.43% | |
| TMUS | B | -3.18% | |
| COST | A | -3.17% | |
| LOW | C | -3.1% | |
| LIN | C | -2.92% | |
| MS | A | -2.88% | |
| V | A | -2.63% | |
| TJX | A | -2.34% | |
| ACN | B | -2.3% | |
| NEE | C | -2.25% | |
| MCK | A | -2.12% | |
| MMC | B | -2.11% | |
| BLK | B | -2.09% | |
| JNJ | C | -2.0% | |
| UNP | C | -2.0% | |
| AVGO | D | -2.0% | |
| PEP | F | -1.98% | |
| MDT | D | -1.88% | |
| MDLZ | F | -1.87% | |
| LLY | F | -1.86% | |
| EXR | C | -1.81% | |
| CEG | C | -1.79% | |
| WEC | A | -1.76% | |
| PH | A | -1.75% | |
| LRCX | F | -1.75% | |
| O | C | -1.5% | |
| CRBG | B | -0.95% |
MVFD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BDIV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
