MCHS vs. XITK ETF Comparison

Comparison of Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) to SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK)
MCHS

Matthews China Discovery Active ETF

MCHS Description

Under normal circumstances, the Matthews China Discovery Active ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 65% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of small companies. In addition, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in China. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.16

Average Daily Volume

2,541

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XITK

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITK Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index. The index is designed to represent the performance of U.S.-listed stock and American Depository Receipts of Technology companies and Technology-related companies within the most innovative segments of the Technology sector and Electronic Media sub-sector of the Media sector, as defined by FactSet Research Systems, Inc. The fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$177.40

Average Daily Volume

1,574

Number of Holdings *

96

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MCHS XITK
30 Days -3.69% 11.80%
60 Days 13.13% 16.12%
90 Days 15.15% 16.56%
12 Months 36.89%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MCHS Weight in XITK Overlap
MCHS Overweight 5 Positions Relative to XITK
Symbol Grade Weight
BEKE D 2.74%
ATAT C 2.6%
ACMR D 2.2%
YMM C 1.92%
BZ F 1.63%
MCHS Underweight 96 Positions Relative to XITK
Symbol Grade Weight
APP B -6.06%
NVDA B -2.46%
TOST B -2.1%
QTWO A -2.05%
SPOT B -1.92%
PI D -1.77%
DOCS C -1.69%
MGNI B -1.57%
NFLX A -1.48%
UPST B -1.46%
PAR A -1.46%
FTNT C -1.44%
TTD B -1.42%
SITM B -1.41%
DAKT C -1.39%
META D -1.38%
PEGA B -1.34%
HCP B -1.3%
DOCU B -1.29%
Z A -1.28%
CWAN B -1.26%
INTA B -1.26%
KD B -1.22%
MNDY C -1.22%
IOT A -1.21%
DUOL A -1.19%
CYBR A -1.19%
AGYS A -1.15%
CRWD B -1.13%
NCNO C -1.1%
TWLO A -1.09%
SEIC B -1.08%
G B -1.05%
VEEV C -1.05%
SSNC B -1.04%
RBLX C -1.03%
SMAR B -1.01%
KLAC F -0.99%
DOCN C -0.98%
ARLO C -0.97%
CHKP C -0.97%
SQ A -0.96%
EA A -0.95%
VRNS D -0.95%
ONTO F -0.94%
AEIS C -0.93%
DDOG A -0.92%
S B -0.91%
CTSH B -0.91%
OLO A -0.9%
AMD F -0.86%
UPWK B -0.86%
OKTA C -0.85%
FVRR B -0.85%
ZS B -0.84%
MPWR F -0.82%
APPN B -0.82%
GTLB B -0.82%
LSPD C -0.82%
GLOB B -0.81%
TENB C -0.81%
DOX D -0.8%
ASGN F -0.8%
ALIT C -0.79%
DT D -0.79%
SPSC D -0.78%
PUBM C -0.73%
JAMF F -0.72%
EPAM B -0.72%
PD C -0.71%
PINS F -0.67%
RAMP B -0.66%
GFS C -0.65%
QLYS B -0.63%
MDB B -0.61%
IAS C -0.61%
RIOT C -0.6%
MXL C -0.6%
ASAN B -0.58%
ZIP D -0.57%
RPD B -0.57%
ROKU D -0.57%
CALX D -0.57%
BRZE C -0.54%
ZI D -0.54%
TDC D -0.54%
SMCI F -0.53%
PRO C -0.49%
DV C -0.48%
U C -0.46%
CLVT D -0.45%
PATH C -0.41%
OPEN F -0.39%
CNXC F -0.34%
FSLY D -0.32%
APPS F -0.18%
Compare ETFs