IPDP vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.79

Average Daily Volume

1,280

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$97.01

Average Daily Volume

11,161

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	CZA
30 Days	-1.75%	-4.13%
60 Days	2.04%	1.37%
90 Days	3.68%	4.67%
12 Months	26.03%	14.76%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in CZA	Overlap
AOS	B	2.05%	1.0%	1.0%
DOV	A	2.26%	1.9%	1.9%
HIG	D	2.32%	2.31%	2.31%
ITT	B	2.14%	0.8%	0.8%
SEIC	C	2.07%	0.67%	0.67%

IPDP Overweight 44 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	A	2.52%
AVGO	B	2.51%
TT	A	2.37%
QCOM	B	2.37%
TRV	D	2.36%
KLAC	B	2.32%
APH	A	2.28%
APOG	A	2.22%
DCI	A	2.19%
GWW	D	2.18%
CTAS	A	2.18%
A	C	2.17%
MCK	A	2.13%
HI	A	2.12%
AIT	D	2.11%
SYK	C	2.1%
SHW	D	2.08%
FAST	C	2.06%
RGA	A	2.06%
CSX	D	2.02%
BRC	A	2.0%
HD	C	1.98%
ELV	A	1.98%
ABT	C	1.96%
ABM	B	1.95%
MSI	A	1.94%
ADP	D	1.93%
GPC	A	1.91%
PAYX	D	1.89%
CHE	D	1.89%
CAH	D	1.88%
ROK	D	1.87%
WTS	D	1.87%
SNA	D	1.86%
CSCO	D	1.81%
MMC	D	1.79%
UPS	D	1.76%
JNJ	F	1.76%
ACN	F	1.74%
NSP	B	1.71%
AAPL	F	1.62%
UNH	C	1.58%
HUM	F	1.12%
GL	D	0.93%

IPDP Underweight 90 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WAB	A	-2.24%
WTW	D	-2.13%
GLW	C	-2.13%
EQR	A	-1.99%
ZBH	F	-1.92%
DTE	B	-1.83%
ETR	A	-1.78%
VLTO	A	-1.74%
ES	A	-1.72%
STT	B	-1.7%
BAX	C	-1.64%
HUBB	A	-1.62%
MKC	A	-1.57%
WRB	D	-1.56%
CHKP	D	-1.54%
APTV	F	-1.5%
CINF	B	-1.48%
BAH	C	-1.47%
J	C	-1.42%
LDOS	A	-1.38%
JBHT	F	-1.36%
CSL	A	-1.36%
TDY	D	-1.34%
AVY	B	-1.34%
WMG	D	-1.34%
IEX	D	-1.33%
LII	B	-1.27%
EG	D	-1.26%
SUI	D	-1.23%
GGG	D	-1.19%
CAG	A	-1.15%
TRMB	C	-1.14%
RPM	D	-1.08%
BAP	C	-1.07%
AMCR	D	-1.06%
LOGI	D	-1.03%
UDR	A	-0.99%
ACM	A	-0.97%
NI	A	-0.97%
CNA	D	-0.95%
GLPI	F	-0.94%
RNR	D	-0.94%
XP	F	-0.92%
NVT	A	-0.91%
FLEX	B	-0.89%
PFGC	D	-0.87%
REG	D	-0.87%
HII	C	-0.86%
RRX	C	-0.84%
DOX	D	-0.83%
EMN	B	-0.83%
SNX	A	-0.81%
MOS	F	-0.8%
QGEN	D	-0.77%
UNM	C	-0.77%
ALV	B	-0.76%
WEX	D	-0.76%
REXR	F	-0.74%
AIZ	D	-0.73%
SKX	B	-0.73%
ATR	B	-0.72%
WWD	A	-0.7%
CACI	A	-0.67%
GNTX	C	-0.64%
INGR	C	-0.58%
ALSN	B	-0.53%
RHP	C	-0.51%
IVZ	F	-0.5%
VNT	C	-0.48%
RRR	B	-0.48%
G	F	-0.47%
ESAB	A	-0.47%
LFUS	D	-0.46%
KEX	A	-0.45%
ESNT	C	-0.44%
SON	C	-0.44%
ESI	D	-0.44%
ZWS	D	-0.43%
UGI	A	-0.43%
FLO	A	-0.41%
AXS	D	-0.41%
AMG	C	-0.41%
BLCO	D	-0.4%
JHG	B	-0.4%
MDU	A	-0.39%
FELE	B	-0.37%
ACT	A	-0.36%
CRUS	C	-0.36%
FUL	D	-0.32%
CPA	D	-0.31%