HRTS vs. INNO ETF Comparison

Comparison of Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS) to Harbor Disruptive Innovation ETF (INNO)
HRTS

Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF

HRTS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in publicly listed companies that derive at least 50% of revenues from products or services related to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and/or metabolic diseases, as defined by the Centers for Diseases Control and Preventions. The fund advisor generally is expected to consist of more than 15 companies but not more than 100 companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.20

Average Daily Volume

14,638

Number of Holdings *

36

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
INNO

Harbor Disruptive Innovation ETF

INNO Description INNO invests in stocks of any size with growth potential linked to disruptive innovation. The fund aims to achieve enhanced risk-adjusted investment outcome by utilizing an active multi-manager approach in which the advisor allocates assets among subadvisors. Each subadvisor represents a strategy that targets associated disruptive companies in technology, advanced therapies, analog-to-digital transition, structural changes and secular trends, and products or services with large demand. The advisor determines and adjusts allocations based on qualitative and quantitative assessments of each strategy, as well as in combination. The fund may invest up to 25% in foreign markets, including developing countries. INNO utilizes the same investment strategy and portfolio management team as its mutual fund counterpart, Harbor Disruptive Innovation Fund.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$16.05

Average Daily Volume

37,895

Number of Holdings *

68

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period HRTS INNO
30 Days -0.75% 1.67%
60 Days -6.06% 3.35%
90 Days -1.75% 12.34%
12 Months 33.35%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in HRTS Weight in INNO Overlap
ASND F 2.06% 1.71% 1.71%
DXCM C 1.99% 0.32% 0.32%
LLY F 5.48% 0.65% 0.65%
PODD A 2.03% 0.55% 0.55%
RCKT F 2.07% 0.45% 0.45%
HRTS Overweight 31 Positions Relative to INNO
Symbol Grade Weight
AMGN C 7.87%
ALNY C 5.47%
VRTX D 4.96%
CRNX B 3.79%
BBIO D 3.62%
CYTK F 3.25%
MDT B 2.9%
REGN F 2.76%
MREO D 2.68%
MASI A 2.52%
IONS F 2.41%
BSX C 2.28%
RARE D 2.22%
NTLA F 2.11%
MIRM B 2.08%
MLYS B 2.05%
EW D 1.97%
KROS A 1.96%
ARWR F 1.58%
NVS D 1.33%
AKRO A 1.19%
WST B 1.17%
SLN F 1.13%
VKTX A 1.07%
EWTX B 0.99%
MDGL A 0.95%
NARI A 0.84%
TERN D 0.72%
VERV C 0.64%
TNYA F 0.38%
RANI F 0.32%
HRTS Underweight 63 Positions Relative to INNO
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA B -4.19%
NOW A -3.88%
LRCX F -3.55%
GOOG A -3.31%
MELI A -3.3%
FI A -3.14%
PGR D -3.08%
DHR D -2.93%
URI B -2.93%
SHOP B -2.9%
LIN C -2.88%
CDNS C -2.87%
AMZN A -2.79%
DASH A -2.61%
TXN A -2.32%
IOT C -2.23%
META B -2.1%
MSFT D -1.99%
GOOGL A -1.93%
TEAM A -1.78%
AMD F -1.6%
CMG B -1.58%
TOST A -1.55%
CGNX B -1.26%
NET B -1.22%
DDOG B -1.2%
PCOR B -1.11%
NFLX A -0.98%
SAP B -0.89%
HUBS B -0.89%
MEDP F -0.89%
MNDY A -0.89%
GTLS B -0.86%
S B -0.85%
SE B -0.84%
CRM A -0.83%
PANW B -0.79%
ORCL B -0.78%
ZS C -0.76%
ICLR F -0.73%
MTSI B -0.72%
LSCC C -0.67%
ROKU D -0.66%
DT B -0.65%
TSM B -0.64%
AMAT F -0.63%
GEV A -0.62%
NU C -0.62%
MDB F -0.61%
SQ B -0.6%
MRNA F -0.57%
OKTA D -0.54%
HUBB B -0.48%
DKNG F -0.48%
LEGN F -0.47%
SNOW C -0.43%
CRWD C -0.42%
SAIA A -0.38%
GLBE B -0.37%
TDG C -0.36%
TSLA A -0.35%
PCVX C -0.33%
BCYC D -0.2%
Compare ETFs