FLV vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
FLV

American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF

FLV Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of large capitalization companies. The portfolio managers may sell stocks from the fund's portfolio if they believe a stock no longer meets their valuation criteria, a stock's risk parameters outweigh its return opportunity, more attractive alternatives are identified or specific events alter a stock's prospects.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.41

Average Daily Volume

10,304

Number of Holdings *

39

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$87.87

Average Daily Volume

7,001

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FLV XHS
30 Days -1.68% -6.11%
60 Days 1.15% -1.84%
90 Days 1.80% 0.67%
12 Months 7.21% -1.42%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FLV Weight in XHS Overlap
DGX A 2.62% 2.07% 2.07%
HSIC D 2.5% 1.95% 1.95%
FLV Overweight 37 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
JNJ F 6.89%
MDT D 5.45%
ZBH F 4.23%
DUK A 4.19%
ATO A 3.76%
XOM B 3.64%
UL B 3.54%
NSC D 3.45%
CL A 3.39%
UPS D 3.38%
TTE A 3.01%
RGA A 2.87%
JPM B 2.86%
TFC A 2.64%
KMB A 2.64%
BRK.A D 2.28%
KVUE F 2.24%
BK A 2.17%
ALL A 2.17%
RTX A 2.14%
SON C 2.02%
FFIV C 1.97%
NVS B 1.97%
MDLZ B 1.93%
BDX F 1.92%
CAG A 1.79%
VZ D 1.78%
SCHW A 1.61%
BUD C 1.54%
TEL D 1.54%
ADI A 1.52%
PKG D 1.31%
BLK C 1.26%
CSCO D 1.25%
MMC D 1.25%
PSA D 1.11%
DIS D 1.04%
FLV Underweight 56 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
ELV A -2.18%
UNH C -2.16%
EHC A -2.15%
RDNT A -2.14%
CI A -2.13%
MCK A -2.05%
HQY C -2.05%
PINC D -2.04%
AMED D -2.03%
HUM F -2.0%
OPCH D -2.0%
ENSG D -1.97%
CNC D -1.97%
PDCO D -1.96%
OMI C -1.96%
DVA B -1.95%
CHE D -1.95%
SEM C -1.95%
BKD A -1.93%
THC D -1.93%
CVS F -1.93%
AMN D -1.93%
LH F -1.92%
CAH D -1.92%
MOH F -1.92%
HCA D -1.91%
AGL F -1.9%
PGNY F -1.88%
NEO D -1.83%
NHC C -1.82%
UHS C -1.82%
RCM F -1.81%
HIMS C -1.81%
ACHC D -1.79%
GH F -1.76%
CRVL C -1.7%
SGRY F -1.66%
PRVA F -1.62%
ADUS D -1.58%
ACCD F -1.45%
CYH B -1.43%
CCRN F -1.43%
MD D -1.39%
OPK B -1.39%
USPH C -1.31%
AHCO C -1.29%
LFST D -1.13%
ASTH D -1.03%
PETQ D -0.93%
DCGO F -0.9%
CSTL C -0.88%
FLGT F -0.86%
ALHC D -0.86%
MODV F -0.63%
NRC F -0.49%
PNTG A -0.44%
Compare ETFs