CZA vs. LCLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA) to Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG)
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$111.49

Average Daily Volume

3,082

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
LCLG

Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LCLG Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests primarily in securities of companies that use innovative technologies or ideas to gain advantage over competitors. The Advisor expects to invest principally in large capitalization equity securities that are traded on U.S. securities exchanges. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities of foreign issuers, including issuers in emerging markets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.90

Average Daily Volume

575

Number of Holdings *

57

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CZA LCLG
30 Days 2.57% 7.03%
60 Days 4.74% 9.73%
90 Days 6.77% 10.64%
12 Months 29.08% 40.52%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CZA Weight in LCLG Overlap
LOGI D 0.81% 0.68% 0.68%
LPLA A 1.43% 0.87% 0.87%
TRMB B 1.1% 0.58% 0.58%
CZA Overweight 91 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
VMC B 2.4%
WAB B 2.18%
AVB B 2.11%
ETR B 2.06%
WTW B 2.04%
BRO B 1.98%
XYL D 1.94%
STT B 1.86%
EQR C 1.86%
PPG F 1.84%
DOV A 1.77%
LYB F 1.73%
FTV C 1.7%
KEYS A 1.7%
VLTO C 1.62%
AEE A 1.58%
WRB A 1.53%
CINF A 1.53%
ES C 1.46%
NTRS A 1.44%
TDY B 1.41%
IFF D 1.41%
PKG A 1.38%
LDOS C 1.38%
CSL C 1.31%
ESS B 1.3%
PFG D 1.3%
J D 1.3%
CHKP C 1.27%
FOX A 1.24%
AER A 1.24%
JBHT C 1.2%
BAH F 1.16%
CRBG B 1.16%
PNR A 1.12%
IEX C 1.11%
BAX F 1.1%
WMG D 1.1%
MAS D 1.09%
WLK D 1.05%
GGG B 0.99%
UDR B 0.95%
AMCR C 0.94%
ACM B 0.94%
WES C 0.93%
GLPI C 0.89%
REG A 0.85%
CNA C 0.85%
PFGC B 0.83%
NVT B 0.8%
WPC C 0.79%
ITT A 0.79%
EMN C 0.76%
RRX B 0.76%
AIZ A 0.73%
BWXT B 0.72%
ATR B 0.71%
CHDN B 0.69%
SEIC B 0.67%
AOS F 0.66%
WWD C 0.65%
CACI D 0.64%
ALSN B 0.64%
EHC B 0.62%
CR A 0.61%
INGR C 0.58%
KNTK A 0.58%
TFX F 0.58%
CHE D 0.53%
VOYA B 0.5%
IVZ B 0.5%
ESAB C 0.48%
BLCO B 0.47%
BPOP C 0.46%
OSK C 0.46%
FLS B 0.46%
MDU D 0.45%
ESI B 0.43%
AWI A 0.43%
IDA A 0.41%
FNB A 0.4%
ESNT F 0.39%
COLD D 0.39%
SLGN A 0.38%
SIGI C 0.38%
SNDR B 0.35%
CWEN C 0.35%
RRR F 0.34%
ACT C 0.34%
ST F 0.31%
FLO D 0.3%
CZA Underweight 54 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
APP B -5.16%
NFLX A -5.14%
AAPL C -4.63%
MA B -4.62%
AMZN C -4.3%
APH A -4.28%
AVGO D -3.99%
META D -3.86%
KLAC F -3.65%
DKS D -3.01%
CTAS B -2.83%
URI C -2.58%
GOOGL C -2.56%
FAST B -2.32%
ODFL C -2.16%
DECK A -1.86%
GOOG C -1.8%
TTD B -1.78%
COIN C -1.78%
LAD A -1.76%
BURL B -1.75%
ANET C -1.69%
WSM C -1.65%
CPRT B -1.62%
SHW B -1.58%
MTD F -1.58%
TXRH B -1.54%
LECO C -1.46%
EA A -1.32%
WAT C -1.29%
SBUX A -1.28%
ZBRA B -1.2%
ADBE C -1.1%
ACN B -1.07%
MAR A -0.98%
NDSN B -0.96%
HD B -0.93%
GPK C -0.9%
MNST C -0.87%
PAYC B -0.84%
A D -0.82%
HUBB B -0.8%
IQV F -0.69%
LULU C -0.66%
ZTS D -0.59%
ELF C -0.56%
ETN A -0.53%
POOL C -0.45%
CRL D -0.41%
NSP F -0.4%
LW C -0.38%
RH C -0.36%
OMF A -0.35%
IPGP D -0.25%
Compare ETFs