BMVP vs. IPDP ETF Comparison
Comparison of Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) to Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP)
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
BMVP Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index seeks to include the 50 securities with the strongest momentum, most muted volatility, most inexpensive valuations, and highest profitability based on an aggregated sector-neutral "MVP" score. Stocks are selected from the top of each sector and size category in a manner designed to produce an index with sector and size dispersion similar to the overall broad market.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$50.12
Average Daily Volume
1,052
53
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
IPDP Description
The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$20.77
Average Daily Volume
1,324
50
Performance
Period | BMVP | IPDP |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 3.31% | 5.99% |
60 Days | 4.53% | 7.03% |
90 Days | 6.66% | 8.82% |
12 Months | 34.01% | 33.16% |
13 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in BMVP | Weight in IPDP | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL | C | 1.78% | 2.01% | 1.78% | |
ABBV | D | 1.54% | 1.98% | 1.54% | |
ADP | B | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.98% | |
AMP | A | 2.2% | 2.0% | 2.0% | |
BRO | B | 1.95% | 2.0% | 1.95% | |
CAH | B | 1.98% | 1.99% | 1.98% | |
COR | B | 1.96% | 2.0% | 1.96% | |
GWW | B | 2.09% | 2.0% | 2.0% | |
HIG | B | 1.85% | 2.03% | 1.85% | |
MMC | B | 1.83% | 2.01% | 1.83% | |
MSI | B | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | |
RTX | C | 1.8% | 2.02% | 1.8% | |
UNH | C | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.86% |
BMVP Overweight 40 Positions Relative to IPDP
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
TRGP | B | 2.44% | |
LNG | B | 2.17% | |
FI | A | 2.16% | |
ETR | B | 2.08% | |
HON | B | 2.04% | |
EOG | A | 2.01% | |
FOXA | B | 1.98% | |
SPG | B | 1.96% | |
AXP | A | 1.95% | |
WTW | B | 1.95% | |
WMT | A | 1.92% | |
T | A | 1.9% | |
TJX | A | 1.88% | |
COST | B | 1.88% | |
HD | A | 1.85% | |
PGR | A | 1.85% | |
MCO | B | 1.84% | |
SHW | A | 1.83% | |
SSNC | B | 1.82% | |
LDOS | C | 1.81% | |
IRM | D | 1.78% | |
SYY | B | 1.77% | |
EIX | B | 1.77% | |
NTAP | C | 1.75% | |
MMM | D | 1.75% | |
VICI | C | 1.75% | |
GD | F | 1.75% | |
KMB | D | 1.73% | |
FE | C | 1.72% | |
OMC | C | 1.72% | |
IBM | C | 1.71% | |
CI | F | 1.71% | |
BAH | F | 1.69% | |
NVR | D | 1.69% | |
LMT | D | 1.68% | |
AMCR | D | 1.66% | |
BBY | D | 1.65% | |
PHM | D | 1.65% | |
LYB | F | 1.59% | |
ELV | F | 1.42% |
BMVP Underweight 37 Positions Relative to IPDP
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
MCK | B | -2.04% | |
ALL | A | -2.02% | |
ABT | B | -2.02% | |
CTAS | B | -2.02% | |
JNJ | D | -2.02% | |
ORI | A | -2.02% | |
TRV | B | -2.01% | |
TT | A | -2.01% | |
SYK | C | -2.01% | |
CSGS | B | -2.0% | |
ABM | B | -2.0% | |
SNA | A | -2.0% | |
HNI | B | -2.0% | |
THG | A | -2.0% | |
PRI | A | -1.99% | |
CSCO | B | -1.99% | |
FAST | B | -1.99% | |
ETN | A | -1.99% | |
A | D | -1.98% | |
RGA | A | -1.98% | |
MRK | F | -1.98% | |
AOS | F | -1.97% | |
ACN | C | -1.97% | |
APH | A | -1.96% | |
DCI | B | -1.96% | |
LECO | B | -1.96% | |
APOG | B | -1.96% | |
SEIC | B | -1.96% | |
DOV | A | -1.96% | |
AIT | A | -1.96% | |
TROW | B | -1.96% | |
IEX | B | -1.95% | |
WTS | B | -1.95% | |
ECL | D | -1.95% | |
KLAC | D | -1.92% | |
BRC | D | -1.9% | |
QCOM | F | -1.88% |
BMVP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
IPDP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords