BEDZ vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.27

Average Daily Volume

287

Number of Holdings *

27

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$100.47

Average Daily Volume

5,945

Number of Holdings *

95

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BEDZ CZA
30 Days -2.52% 2.96%
60 Days -2.39% 1.77%
90 Days 1.39% 6.50%
12 Months 19.40% 18.86%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BEDZ Weight in CZA Overlap
GLPI D 3.1% 0.93% 0.93%
RHP D 4.52% 0.49% 0.49%
BEDZ Overweight 25 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
EXPE F 5.04%
XHR C 5.03%
BKNG B 4.85%
TCOM A 4.78%
MAR D 4.66%
TH C 4.65%
PK D 4.56%
TRIP F 4.47%
HST D 4.43%
APLE F 4.43%
MGM F 4.01%
VICI B 3.99%
BYD F 3.86%
HLT D 3.78%
RLJ F 3.61%
WH F 3.56%
PLYA D 3.49%
RCL B 3.28%
H D 2.43%
IHG D 2.23%
HGV D 2.17%
ABNB D 1.81%
GHG D 1.8%
HTHT C 1.71%
MCRI D 1.49%
BEDZ Underweight 93 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
HIG B -2.26%
GLW A -2.25%
WAB B -2.22%
DOV B -2.0%
WTW D -2.0%
EQR A -1.99%
ZBH D -1.88%
DTE B -1.84%
ETR B -1.81%
VLTO A -1.79%
APTV C -1.72%
ES C -1.7%
STT B -1.69%
HUBB C -1.58%
WRB D -1.54%
MKC C -1.53%
LDOS A -1.52%
BAH C -1.51%
WMG D -1.47%
CSL A -1.45%
CHKP D -1.45%
TDY D -1.42%
CINF D -1.42%
AVY A -1.4%
BAX F -1.4%
JBHT F -1.36%
J D -1.34%
IEX D -1.29%
LII A -1.28%
EG B -1.28%
AMCR A -1.17%
SUI D -1.17%
BAP C -1.1%
CAG C -1.1%
RPM C -1.1%
LOGI C -1.08%
GGG D -1.08%
TRMB D -1.06%
XP F -0.98%
UDR B -0.98%
AOS C -0.97%
NVT B -0.97%
NI A -0.97%
RNR D -0.95%
CNA B -0.94%
ACM D -0.93%
FLEX C -0.88%
PFGC D -0.85%
EMN B -0.85%
REG D -0.84%
SNX A -0.82%
ITT B -0.82%
DOX F -0.81%
SKX A -0.81%
WWD B -0.81%
QGEN B -0.78%
ALV C -0.78%
RRX D -0.78%
UNM B -0.77%
MOS F -0.76%
REXR F -0.76%
ATR C -0.76%
HII D -0.75%
CACI B -0.73%
AIZ D -0.71%
SEIC D -0.68%
WEX D -0.67%
GNTX D -0.62%
INGR B -0.59%
KEX B -0.5%
IVZ C -0.5%
ALSN D -0.49%
LFUS C -0.49%
G C -0.47%
VNT D -0.47%
ESAB B -0.47%
SON B -0.45%
AXS B -0.45%
ESNT B -0.44%
ESI D -0.43%
ZWS B -0.42%
CRUS A -0.42%
JHG A -0.41%
FLO B -0.4%
UGI C -0.4%
BLCO F -0.39%
MDU C -0.39%
AMG D -0.39%
RRR D -0.39%
ACT A -0.37%
FELE D -0.35%
FUL B -0.33%
CPA B -0.32%
Compare ETFs