TMDV vs. PWV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) to PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Value (PWV)

TMDV

ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF

TMDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Russell 3000® Dividend Elite Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by FTSE International Limited, targets companies that are currently members of the Russell 3000 Index, have increased dividend payments each year for at least 35 years, and meet certain liquidity requirements. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.98

Average Daily Volume

350

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PWV

PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Value

PWV Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Value Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Large Cap Value IntellidexSM Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to provide capital appreciation while maintaining consistent stylistically accurate exposure. The Style Intellidexes apply a rigorous 10 factor style isolation process to objectively segregate companies into their appropriate investment style and size universe. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$61.51

Average Daily Volume

32,152

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TMDV	PWV
30 Days	2.88%	4.38%
60 Days	2.50%	5.52%
90 Days	4.41%	6.26%
12 Months	17.53%	31.14%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TMDV	Weight in PWV	Overlap
ABT	B	1.56%	3.26%	1.56%
AFL	B	1.55%	1.39%	1.39%
CVX	A	1.71%	3.52%	1.71%
JNJ	D	1.42%	2.98%	1.42%
KMB	D	1.37%	1.26%	1.26%
KO	D	1.36%	2.8%	1.36%
PG	A	1.44%	3.16%	1.44%

TMDV Overweight 55 Positions Relative to PWV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EMR	A	2.0%
GWW	B	1.94%
RPM	A	1.8%
CBSH	A	1.8%
GRC	A	1.79%
APD	A	1.77%
UBSI	B	1.77%
TROW	B	1.77%
DOV	A	1.76%
RLI	B	1.76%
ADP	B	1.74%
ABM	B	1.71%
ATO	A	1.71%
CSL	C	1.71%
BEN	C	1.71%
ITW	B	1.7%
CINF	A	1.7%
LOW	D	1.69%
WMT	A	1.69%
NUE	C	1.69%
MSEX	B	1.65%
LANC	C	1.65%
SCL	C	1.63%
ORI	A	1.63%
SHW	A	1.62%
AWR	B	1.62%
NWN	A	1.62%
NDSN	B	1.61%
MSA	D	1.6%
NFG	A	1.59%
MCD	D	1.58%
BKH	A	1.58%
TGT	F	1.57%
UVV	B	1.55%
BDX	F	1.52%
CLX	B	1.52%
UGI	A	1.51%
MDT	D	1.5%
SYY	B	1.5%
FRT	B	1.5%
SPGI	C	1.5%
PPG	F	1.49%
UHT	D	1.47%
FUL	F	1.46%
SJW	D	1.43%
CWT	D	1.43%
ED	D	1.43%
PEP	F	1.42%
HRL	D	1.42%
SON	D	1.41%
MKC	D	1.41%
GPC	D	1.39%
SWK	D	1.37%
ADM	D	1.32%
CL	D	1.29%

TMDV Underweight 42 Positions Relative to PWV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WFC	A	-4.15%
BAC	A	-3.7%
JPM	A	-3.52%
IBM	C	-3.37%
XOM	B	-3.28%
BRK.A	B	-3.25%
VZ	C	-3.16%
TXN	C	-3.13%
AMGN	D	-2.9%
ABBV	D	-2.77%
MS	A	-1.78%
COF	B	-1.77%
KMI	A	-1.72%
OKE	A	-1.68%
DELL	C	-1.65%
JCI	C	-1.64%
CMI	A	-1.63%
GM	B	-1.61%
PNC	B	-1.6%
BK	A	-1.59%
URI	B	-1.58%
LNG	B	-1.57%
T	A	-1.56%
KR	B	-1.54%
CAT	B	-1.52%
MET	A	-1.51%
LHX	C	-1.48%
ET	A	-1.48%
PRU	A	-1.47%
EOG	A	-1.45%
CB	C	-1.42%
AIG	B	-1.39%
RTX	C	-1.37%
VLO	C	-1.36%
PSX	C	-1.32%
LMT	D	-1.32%
MPC	D	-1.27%
LEN	D	-1.27%
CI	F	-1.25%
DHI	D	-1.19%
CNC	D	-1.03%
ELV	F	-1.02%