RSHO vs. ECML ETF Comparison
Comparison of Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) to EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML)
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
RSHO Description
Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, common and preferred stocks of publicly listed companies domiciled in the United States that are directly or indirectly economically tied to the rebuilding, bringing back of overseas economic activity, and revitalization of the American (i.e., United States) industrial base ("reshoring companies"). The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$40.49
Average Daily Volume
26,944
25
ECML
EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
ECML Description
The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in U.S. equity securities that the sub-adviser believes are under-valued and under-appreciated by the market. The sub-adviser employs a quantitative and systematic approach to long-term investing. It is expected that the fund will generally hold 60 to 70 stocks that are selected from a universe that includes all publicly traded stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the Nasdaq Market ("Nasdaq").Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.39
Average Daily Volume
1,196
60
Performance
| Period | RSHO | ECML |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 6.07% | 5.65% |
| 60 Days | 8.51% | 4.42% |
| 90 Days | 9.99% | 4.02% |
| 12 Months | 39.82% | 26.43% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in RSHO | Weight in ECML | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEX | F | 2.0% | 1.58% | 1.58% |
RSHO Overweight 24 Positions Relative to ECML
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIT | B | 6.45% | |
| ETN | A | 5.4% | |
| PRIM | A | 5.22% | |
| ROK | C | 5.16% | |
| CLH | C | 4.7% | |
| IR | B | 4.5% | |
| FAST | B | 4.4% | |
| PH | A | 3.85% | |
| VMC | B | 3.85% | |
| FLR | B | 3.43% | |
| CAT | B | 3.26% | |
| FSS | B | 3.22% | |
| HRI | C | 3.14% | |
| WCC | B | 2.92% | |
| EMR | B | 2.87% | |
| ABBV | F | 2.87% | |
| ATI | C | 2.86% | |
| LIN | C | 2.75% | |
| DHR | F | 2.4% | |
| ALLE | C | 2.4% | |
| UNP | C | 2.2% | |
| APG | B | 2.04% | |
| TKR | D | 1.81% | |
| TSM | B | 1.34% |
RSHO Underweight 59 Positions Relative to ECML
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLI | B | -2.33% | |
| ALSN | B | -2.23% | |
| HSII | B | -2.2% | |
| CALM | A | -2.1% | |
| TOL | B | -1.98% | |
| INGR | C | -1.88% | |
| PPC | C | -1.87% | |
| TMHC | C | -1.85% | |
| GRBK | D | -1.83% | |
| CEIX | A | -1.82% | |
| GPI | B | -1.82% | |
| STLD | B | -1.76% | |
| KBH | D | -1.75% | |
| SANM | B | -1.75% | |
| FOXA | A | -1.75% | |
| HCC | B | -1.73% | |
| OSK | C | -1.71% | |
| PHM | D | -1.7% | |
| LNG | A | -1.7% | |
| MHO | D | -1.68% | |
| CMC | B | -1.68% | |
| PRDO | B | -1.68% | |
| GIII | D | -1.68% | |
| SM | B | -1.67% | |
| OVV | B | -1.67% | |
| ARCH | B | -1.65% | |
| ATKR | D | -1.65% | |
| SIRI | C | -1.65% | |
| EOG | A | -1.63% | |
| TPH | D | -1.62% | |
| MO | A | -1.62% | |
| OC | A | -1.62% | |
| COKE | C | -1.6% | |
| PCAR | B | -1.59% | |
| COP | C | -1.58% | |
| NUE | C | -1.57% | |
| PLAB | C | -1.54% | |
| DDS | B | -1.53% | |
| LEN | D | -1.52% | |
| VLO | C | -1.49% | |
| BCC | B | -1.49% | |
| HESM | B | -1.48% | |
| DVN | F | -1.48% | |
| AMR | C | -1.47% | |
| DHI | F | -1.47% | |
| MTH | D | -1.47% | |
| ANDE | D | -1.46% | |
| CF | A | -1.45% | |
| AN | C | -1.45% | |
| MOH | F | -1.43% | |
| IMKTA | C | -1.43% | |
| MPC | D | -1.39% | |
| DINO | D | -1.38% | |
| LBRT | D | -1.38% | |
| ARW | D | -1.32% | |
| BG | D | -1.32% | |
| INSW | F | -1.23% | |
| FOR | F | -1.21% | |
| LPG | F | -1.17% |
RSHO: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ECML: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
