QVAL vs. LYLD ETF Comparison
Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD)
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$47.65
Average Daily Volume
18,021
50
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
LYLD Description
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.95
Average Daily Volume
1,290
50
Performance
| Period | QVAL | LYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 6.05% | 5.90% |
| 60 Days | 4.08% | 4.51% |
| 90 Days | 6.70% | 6.16% |
| 12 Months | 28.74% |
11 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in QVAL | Weight in LYLD | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKR | C | 2.26% | 2.26% | 2.26% | |
| CMCSA | C | 1.99% | 2.08% | 1.99% | |
| CNC | F | 1.87% | 1.65% | 1.65% | |
| FOXA | C | 2.12% | 2.53% | 2.12% | |
| IPG | C | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.8% | |
| JBL | C | 2.02% | 2.06% | 2.02% | |
| LEN | C | 1.92% | 1.97% | 1.92% | |
| TAP | C | 2.18% | 2.27% | 2.18% | |
| THC | D | 1.89% | 1.9% | 1.89% | |
| TOL | A | 2.01% | 2.28% | 2.01% | |
| UHS | D | 1.87% | 2.0% | 1.87% |
QVAL Overweight 39 Positions Relative to LYLD
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | A | 2.28% | |
| UAL | B | 2.22% | |
| MO | A | 2.19% | |
| FTI | A | 2.15% | |
| ALSN | B | 2.14% | |
| HES | C | 2.14% | |
| LRN | B | 2.12% | |
| GTES | A | 2.11% | |
| DAL | B | 2.1% | |
| SNA | A | 2.1% | |
| WFRD | F | 2.07% | |
| TGT | F | 2.07% | |
| URBN | C | 2.06% | |
| SM | C | 2.06% | |
| ANF | C | 2.05% | |
| SIG | B | 2.02% | |
| CTSH | B | 2.02% | |
| MHK | D | 2.0% | |
| HPQ | B | 2.0% | |
| MMM | D | 1.99% | |
| TEX | D | 1.99% | |
| UTHR | C | 1.98% | |
| WSM | B | 1.97% | |
| CAT | B | 1.97% | |
| HRB | D | 1.96% | |
| CVS | D | 1.95% | |
| GPK | C | 1.95% | |
| BBY | D | 1.94% | |
| DKS | C | 1.94% | |
| CNH | A | 1.9% | |
| ELV | F | 1.9% | |
| OMC | C | 1.89% | |
| LYB | F | 1.88% | |
| FCX | F | 1.87% | |
| CRI | F | 1.85% | |
| MAT | D | 1.78% | |
| MOH | F | 1.76% | |
| ASO | F | 1.76% | |
| CROX | F | 1.7% |
QVAL Underweight 39 Positions Relative to LYLD
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PYPL | A | -2.73% | |
| YUMC | B | -2.31% | |
| KEY | A | -2.31% | |
| AFL | B | -2.25% | |
| CFG | B | -2.25% | |
| BK | A | -2.22% | |
| USB | A | -2.2% | |
| T | A | -2.16% | |
| TFC | B | -2.16% | |
| GM | B | -2.16% | |
| EBAY | C | -2.16% | |
| CF | B | -2.14% | |
| HIG | B | -2.13% | |
| AFG | A | -2.1% | |
| MET | A | -2.07% | |
| PHM | C | -2.05% | |
| STLD | B | -1.96% | |
| EOG | C | -1.94% | |
| EMN | D | -1.93% | |
| CRBG | B | -1.92% | |
| RS | B | -1.91% | |
| PFG | C | -1.89% | |
| PRU | A | -1.88% | |
| AIG | B | -1.87% | |
| GIS | D | -1.87% | |
| CVX | B | -1.87% | |
| SNX | C | -1.85% | |
| MRO | B | -1.84% | |
| KHC | D | -1.82% | |
| CI | D | -1.8% | |
| COP | D | -1.8% | |
| CAG | D | -1.77% | |
| NUE | D | -1.72% | |
| PSX | C | -1.67% | |
| MPC | F | -1.65% | |
| HAL | C | -1.65% | |
| VLO | C | -1.62% | |
| DVN | F | -1.51% | |
| ADM | F | -1.51% |
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LYLD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
