PCGG vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
PCGG

Polen Capital Global Growth ETF

PCGG Description

The fund is a non-diversified, actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a focused portfolio of approximately 25 to 40 common stocks of large capitalization companies that are located anywhere in the world, including companies in both developed and emerging markets, and, in the opinion of the sub-advisor to the fund, have a sustainable competitive advantage. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$11.83

Average Daily Volume

50,065

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.36

Average Daily Volume

259,855

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PCGG QLTY
30 Days 2.78% 0.12%
60 Days 3.14% -0.15%
90 Days 4.23% 1.76%
12 Months 16.38% 25.82%
7 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PCGG Weight in QLTY Overlap
ABT B 4.56% 4.17% 4.17%
ACN B 2.73% 3.3% 2.73%
AMZN C 9.22% 2.4% 2.4%
MSFT D 5.96% 6.46% 5.96%
ORCL A 1.53% 4.71% 1.53%
TMO F 2.85% 0.91% 0.91%
V A 4.19% 3.22% 3.22%
PCGG Overweight 14 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
GOOG C 7.72%
MA B 4.62%
ADBE C 4.24%
WDAY B 4.12%
MSCI C 4.1%
AON A 4.03%
SHOP B 3.88%
ICLR D 3.35%
PAYC B 3.06%
GLOB B 2.42%
NOW A 2.27%
ZTS D 2.14%
ABNB C 1.62%
ADP A 1.47%
PCGG Underweight 27 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
AAPL C -5.33%
META D -4.5%
GOOGL C -4.43%
JNJ C -4.24%
UNH B -3.62%
TXN C -3.53%
PG C -3.2%
ISRG A -2.92%
KLAC F -2.85%
LRCX F -2.85%
CRM B -2.84%
KO D -2.81%
HLT A -2.62%
ARMK B -2.56%
ELV F -2.5%
WFC A -2.45%
AVGO D -2.45%
MRK D -2.41%
USB A -2.31%
OTIS C -2.25%
TJX A -2.14%
GE D -1.73%
MDLZ F -1.72%
LLY F -1.61%
STZ D -1.59%
CI D -1.49%
DGX A -1.35%
Compare ETFs