NULV vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

or Try an Advanced Search...

NULV vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of NuShares ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)

NULV

NuShares ESG Large-Cap Value ETF

NULV Description

The Fund seeks to track the investments results, before fees and expenses, of the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Value Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.73

Average Daily Volume

94,564

Number of Holdings ^*

103

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.50

Average Daily Volume

265,587

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	NULV	QLTY
30 Days	1.68%	0.40%
60 Days	2.71%	0.12%
90 Days	5.63%	2.04%
12 Months	25.44%	26.17%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in NULV	Weight in QLTY	Overlap
ACN	B	0.03%	3.3%	0.03%
CI	D	1.5%	1.49%	1.49%
JNJ	C	1.64%	4.24%	1.64%
KO	D	2.11%	2.81%	2.11%
MRK	D	1.52%	2.41%	1.52%
ORCL	A	2.85%	4.71%	2.85%
TXN	C	1.97%	3.53%	1.97%

NULV Overweight 96 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DIS	B	2.25%
IBM	C	2.05%
FI	A	1.99%
PEP	F	1.92%
LOW	C	1.89%
VZ	C	1.89%
INTC	C	1.85%
C	A	1.82%
PNC	B	1.76%
OKE	A	1.74%
AMGN	F	1.71%
WELL	A	1.7%
DHR	F	1.69%
GS	A	1.69%
BKR	A	1.67%
BK	A	1.64%
DE	B	1.6%
ADI	D	1.56%
MS	A	1.54%
TRV	B	1.54%
PGR	A	1.5%
MMM	D	1.5%
CSCO	B	1.48%
MMC	B	1.46%
KR	B	1.45%
COR	B	1.39%
HCA	F	1.37%
EXC	C	1.36%
SBUX	A	1.36%
ADP	A	1.36%
ECL	D	1.29%
NXPI	D	1.28%
ED	C	1.26%
AXP	A	1.24%
BAC	A	1.23%
AMT	C	1.21%
CAH	B	1.2%
FDX	B	1.12%
FTV	C	1.08%
ADM	D	1.06%
CAT	B	1.04%
RF	A	0.95%
UPS	C	0.93%
ES	C	0.88%
LYB	F	0.87%
CBOE	C	0.85%
FIS	C	0.82%
FSLR	F	0.81%
A	D	0.77%
HD	B	0.76%
KMB	C	0.72%
BR	A	0.71%
J	D	0.71%
CHD	A	0.7%
IR	B	0.7%
URI	C	0.7%
KDP	F	0.69%
WTW	B	0.68%
GILD	C	0.65%
JCI	B	0.64%
HPQ	B	0.59%
PPG	F	0.55%
STLD	B	0.54%
BG	D	0.51%
MET	A	0.45%
NEM	D	0.43%
PHM	D	0.42%
SOLV	D	0.41%
HIG	B	0.41%
EQIX	A	0.41%
ATO	A	0.4%
HOLX	D	0.37%
OC	A	0.36%
HOOD	B	0.35%
MOS	F	0.34%
CNP	A	0.32%
SPGI	C	0.29%
DINO	D	0.28%
QRVO	F	0.26%
IPG	D	0.23%
PSA	C	0.19%
WDC	D	0.19%
TGT	F	0.17%
TFC	A	0.17%
SYY	D	0.16%
ETN	A	0.14%
IRM	C	0.1%
BALL	F	0.1%
BMY	B	0.09%
ZBH	C	0.09%
PRU	A	0.08%
REGN	F	0.04%
AWK	C	0.04%
STE	D	0.02%
CNH	C	0.02%
WTRG	B	0.02%

NULV Underweight 27 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSFT	D	-6.46%
AAPL	C	-5.33%
META	D	-4.5%
GOOGL	C	-4.43%
ABT	B	-4.17%
UNH	B	-3.62%
V	A	-3.22%
PG	C	-3.2%
ISRG	A	-2.92%
KLAC	F	-2.85%
LRCX	F	-2.85%
CRM	B	-2.84%
HLT	A	-2.62%
ARMK	B	-2.56%
ELV	F	-2.5%
WFC	A	-2.45%
AVGO	D	-2.45%
AMZN	C	-2.4%
USB	A	-2.31%
OTIS	C	-2.25%
TJX	A	-2.14%
GE	D	-1.73%
MDLZ	F	-1.72%
LLY	F	-1.61%
STZ	D	-1.59%
DGX	A	-1.35%
TMO	F	-0.91%