MOAT vs. EMSF ETF Comparison
Comparison of Market Vectors Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) to Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF)
MOAT
Market Vectors Wide Moat ETF
MOAT Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Morningstar® Wide Moat Focus IndexSM (the "Wide Moat Index"). The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities that comprise the fund's benchmark index. The index is comprised of securities issued by companies that Morningstar, Inc. ("Morningstar" or the "Wide Moat Index Provider") determines have sustainable competitive advantages based on a proprietary methodology that considers quantitative and qualitative factors ("wide moat companies"). The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$98.59
Average Daily Volume
661,978
53
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
EMSF Description
EMSF actively invests in common and preferred stocks of companies in emerging markets, including countries that may be considered frontier. While the fund has an all-cap exposure, it expects to invest substantially in smaller companies. The fund looks for sustainable growth based on fundamental characteristics such as balance sheet information, size, cash flow stability, and financial health. It also applies various ESG standards, using third-party data and the adviser's proprietary research, to identify investments that potentially contribute to a sustainable future by addressing global environmental and social challenges. The fund also employs exclusionary ESG screens, which avoid controversial businesses such as tobacco, weapons, and fossil fuels. The fund may engage its portfolio companies on sustainability and governance matters through active dialogue, exercising shareholder rights, and encouraging enhanced ESG disclosure.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.86
Average Daily Volume
2,360
6
Performance
| Period | MOAT | EMSF |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.11% | -5.22% |
| 60 Days | 2.13% | -1.79% |
| 90 Days | 3.74% | -0.15% |
| 12 Months | 25.88% | 0.79% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in MOAT | Weight in EMSF | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | F | 1.17% | 1.18% | 1.17% |
MOAT Overweight 52 Positions Relative to EMSF
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | B | 3.14% | |
| BMY | B | 3.0% | |
| GILD | C | 2.97% | |
| ADSK | A | 2.94% | |
| EMR | A | 2.87% | |
| USB | A | 2.78% | |
| MKTX | D | 2.73% | |
| BIO | D | 2.72% | |
| KVUE | A | 2.69% | |
| DIS | B | 2.69% | |
| TRU | D | 2.69% | |
| MO | A | 2.62% | |
| VEEV | C | 2.57% | |
| ALLE | D | 2.54% | |
| CTVA | C | 2.48% | |
| ZBH | C | 2.37% | |
| ADBE | C | 2.36% | |
| CPB | D | 2.29% | |
| A | D | 2.21% | |
| PFE | D | 2.1% | |
| IFF | D | 2.06% | |
| NKE | D | 2.05% | |
| BA | F | 1.87% | |
| HII | D | 1.82% | |
| FTNT | C | 1.73% | |
| EL | F | 1.56% | |
| SCHW | B | 1.51% | |
| WDAY | B | 1.44% | |
| CLX | B | 1.44% | |
| WAT | B | 1.4% | |
| GOOGL | C | 1.39% | |
| IEX | B | 1.39% | |
| AMZN | C | 1.37% | |
| APD | A | 1.36% | |
| HON | B | 1.35% | |
| SBUX | A | 1.33% | |
| NOC | D | 1.32% | |
| CMCSA | B | 1.3% | |
| MAS | D | 1.29% | |
| OTIS | C | 1.29% | |
| RTX | C | 1.25% | |
| UPS | C | 1.24% | |
| ROK | B | 1.24% | |
| KEYS | A | 1.23% | |
| MSFT | F | 1.21% | |
| EFX | F | 1.2% | |
| NXPI | D | 1.16% | |
| GEHC | F | 1.14% | |
| TMO | F | 1.04% | |
| MCHP | D | 1.02% | |
| TER | D | 0.97% | |
| ETSY | D | 0.91% |
MOAT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EMSF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
