MCHS vs. PSCT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT)
MCHS

Matthews China Discovery Active ETF

MCHS Description

Under normal circumstances, the Matthews China Discovery Active ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 65% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of small companies. In addition, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in China. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.36

Average Daily Volume

2,550

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PSCT

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

PSCT Description The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.73

Average Daily Volume

16,932

Number of Holdings *

63

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MCHS PSCT
30 Days -6.26% 6.44%
60 Days 9.74% 6.42%
90 Days 11.88% 3.39%
12 Months 15.36%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MCHS Weight in PSCT Overlap
MCHS Overweight 5 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
BEKE D 2.74%
ATAT C 2.6%
ACMR F 2.2%
YMM C 1.92%
BZ F 1.63%
MCHS Underweight 63 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
SPSC C -4.3%
BMI B -4.12%
ACIW B -3.75%
MARA C -3.5%
ITRI B -3.41%
BOX B -3.23%
IDCC A -3.04%
PLXS B -2.79%
SANM B -2.77%
NSIT F -2.76%
AEIS B -2.72%
PI D -2.63%
SITM B -2.46%
DXC B -2.34%
SMTC B -2.26%
ENV B -2.08%
BL B -1.97%
FORM D -1.92%
ALRM C -1.92%
PRGS A -1.86%
AGYS A -1.79%
DV C -1.78%
KLIC B -1.66%
DIOD D -1.64%
OSIS B -1.59%
TTMI B -1.56%
YOU D -1.56%
ACLS F -1.55%
DOCN D -1.51%
VIAV B -1.43%
PLUS F -1.39%
VYX B -1.31%
EXTR B -1.31%
RAMP C -1.23%
ROG D -1.15%
CALX D -1.12%
BHE B -1.11%
CTS C -1.07%
KN B -1.04%
UCTT D -1.04%
NTCT C -1.02%
PLAB C -0.99%
VECO F -0.98%
HLIT D -0.91%
ATEN B -0.79%
COHU C -0.78%
ARLO C -0.74%
SCSC B -0.74%
DGII B -0.74%
MXL C -0.71%
ICHR C -0.67%
XRX F -0.63%
PDFS C -0.61%
CXM C -0.61%
WOLF F -0.58%
CNXN C -0.57%
AOSL C -0.48%
NABL F -0.47%
SWI B -0.46%
CEVA B -0.43%
SEDG F -0.41%
VSAT F -0.4%
CRSR C -0.19%
Compare ETFs