IPDP vs. SMIG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.87

Average Daily Volume

1,314

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SMIG

AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF

SMIG Description

ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by ETF Series Solutions. The fund is co-managed by Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Bahl & Gaynor, Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in dividend paying stocks of companies. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.40

Average Daily Volume

70,727

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	SMIG
30 Days	-3.61%	-0.52%
60 Days	-0.36%	2.53%
90 Days	3.49%	5.27%
12 Months	29.12%	18.76%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in SMIG	Overlap
HIG	D	2.32%	3.28%	2.32%
NSP	D	1.76%	1.07%	1.07%
SNA	D	1.76%	3.74%	1.76%

IPDP Overweight 46 Positions Relative to SMIG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	A	2.5%
AVGO	D	2.41%
APOG	A	2.38%
APH	A	2.37%
TT	A	2.36%
DOV	A	2.33%
QCOM	A	2.26%
TRV	C	2.23%
KLAC	B	2.22%
DCI	B	2.16%
ITT	D	2.15%
CTAS	A	2.15%
RGA	A	2.15%
HI	F	2.15%
MCK	C	2.14%
GWW	D	2.13%
A	C	2.13%
GPC	B	2.09%
ELV	B	2.08%
SYK	D	2.07%
SEIC	C	2.04%
SHW	D	2.02%
BRC	B	2.01%
FAST	D	2.01%
AIT	C	1.98%
MSI	A	1.97%
AOS	D	1.96%
HD	D	1.94%
CSX	D	1.94%
ABM	B	1.92%
ADP	D	1.91%
ABT	D	1.89%
PAYX	D	1.87%
WTS	C	1.85%
ROK	F	1.81%
MMC	D	1.81%
CAH	F	1.8%
CSCO	F	1.79%
UPS	F	1.79%
JNJ	F	1.77%
CHE	F	1.75%
ACN	F	1.69%
UNH	C	1.64%
AAPL	C	1.6%
GL	F	1.15%
HUM	F	1.08%

IPDP Underweight 41 Positions Relative to SMIG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BAH	B	-5.17%
HUBB	D	-4.78%
VCTR	A	-4.41%
BR	C	-4.3%
WSO	A	-3.82%
DOX	F	-3.62%
TRGP	B	-3.57%
DGX	A	-3.12%
NI	A	-3.09%
PKG	C	-3.04%
AVY	A	-2.94%
EVR	B	-2.91%
PRGO	B	-2.88%
IPAR	F	-2.79%
NTAP	C	-2.44%
AFG	D	-2.41%
LANC	D	-2.25%
ADC	B	-2.25%
AVT	A	-2.09%
HOMB	A	-2.02%
PAGP	B	-1.94%
ATO	A	-1.91%
RPM	D	-1.85%
LNT	B	-1.85%
TRNO	D	-1.8%
CSGS	F	-1.71%
TXRH	A	-1.66%
CAG	B	-1.6%
CBOE	D	-1.59%
AVNT	A	-1.52%
NXST	C	-1.51%
FFBC	A	-1.37%
PAG	D	-1.16%
ELS	D	-1.1%
MTH	A	-0.96%
CMS	A	-0.89%
SON	D	-0.87%
HBAN	A	-0.65%
TSCO	A	-0.55%
USPH	C	-0.54%
IPG	F	-0.34%