IHF vs. EAGL ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL)
IHF
iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF
IHF Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$53.42
Average Daily Volume
61,864
66
EAGL
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
EAGL Description
EAGL seeks to outperform the US equity markets through a narrow exposure to global value stocks. The actively managed fund generally holds 15-35 stocks assessed based on the advisers estimate of their long-term intrinsic values. The belief is that there is an opportunity to capture excess returns through a longer-term perspective. Thus, several investments of the fund are expected to be made with a five to seven-year holding period. The portfolio is constructed using a fundamental analysis that considers business changes, growth prospects, margins, industry factors, and valuation scenarios over the next 5 to 10 years, which seeks to identify a margin of safety based on valuation discount, resilience, growth opportunities, and strong management. The fund primarily focuses on US stocks and large-cap companies. However, the fund may invest in companies of any size and geographic location, including emerging markets. EAGL launched by converting an SMA with $1.8 billion in assets.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.58
Average Daily Volume
52,616
24
Performance
| Period | IHF | EAGL |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.32% | 3.94% |
| 60 Days | -6.54% | 4.70% |
| 90 Days | -7.21% | 6.78% |
| 12 Months | 4.98% |
IHF Overweight 63 Positions Relative to EAGL
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI | D | 8.11% | |
| VEEV | C | 4.67% | |
| CVS | D | 4.65% | |
| HCA | F | 4.32% | |
| CNC | D | 3.83% | |
| LH | B | 3.38% | |
| DGX | A | 3.06% | |
| MOH | F | 2.95% | |
| THC | D | 2.55% | |
| UHS | D | 2.05% | |
| EHC | B | 1.7% | |
| HQY | A | 1.47% | |
| CHE | D | 1.44% | |
| ENSG | C | 1.39% | |
| DVA | C | 1.27% | |
| DOCS | C | 1.06% | |
| RDNT | B | 0.89% | |
| SEM | B | 0.67% | |
| OPCH | D | 0.64% | |
| HIMS | B | 0.63% | |
| GH | B | 0.61% | |
| ACHC | F | 0.6% | |
| CRVL | B | 0.54% | |
| AMED | F | 0.5% | |
| PINC | B | 0.4% | |
| RCM | A | 0.38% | |
| ADUS | D | 0.37% | |
| PRVA | C | 0.37% | |
| NEO | C | 0.33% | |
| ASTH | F | 0.29% | |
| SGRY | F | 0.29% | |
| NHC | C | 0.27% | |
| TDOC | C | 0.27% | |
| EVH | F | 0.23% | |
| USPH | B | 0.23% | |
| CLOV | D | 0.21% | |
| ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
| MD | C | 0.2% | |
| PGNY | F | 0.19% | |
| CERT | F | 0.19% | |
| SDGR | C | 0.18% | |
| BKD | F | 0.18% | |
| BTSG | C | 0.18% | |
| PHR | F | 0.17% | |
| LFST | B | 0.16% | |
| PNTG | D | 0.16% | |
| AMN | F | 0.15% | |
| HSTM | B | 0.13% | |
| CSTL | D | 0.13% | |
| PACS | F | 0.11% | |
| OPK | C | 0.1% | |
| CYH | F | 0.08% | |
| HCAT | D | 0.08% | |
| SLP | D | 0.08% | |
| AGL | F | 0.08% | |
| FLGT | F | 0.06% | |
| GDRX | F | 0.06% | |
| DCGO | B | 0.06% | |
| NRC | F | 0.05% | |
| CCRN | F | 0.05% | |
| DH | F | 0.04% | |
| ACCD | D | 0.04% | |
| MODV | C | 0.03% |
IHF Underweight 21 Positions Relative to EAGL
IHF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EAGL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
