HRTS vs. NOBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS) to ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)
HRTS

Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF

HRTS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in publicly listed companies that derive at least 50% of revenues from products or services related to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and/or metabolic diseases, as defined by the Centers for Diseases Control and Preventions. The fund advisor generally is expected to consist of more than 15 companies but not more than 100 companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$30.77

Average Daily Volume

14,144

Number of Holdings *

36

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF

NOBL Description The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P 500® Dividend Aristocrats® Index (the "index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$106.34

Average Daily Volume

422,256

Number of Holdings *

65

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period HRTS NOBL
30 Days -9.25% 0.16%
60 Days -11.27% 1.29%
90 Days -12.29% 3.19%
12 Months 15.50% 20.15%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in HRTS Weight in NOBL Overlap
MDT D 2.79% 1.46% 1.46%
WST C 1.43% 1.41% 1.41%
HRTS Overweight 34 Positions Relative to NOBL
Symbol Grade Weight
LLY F 6.44%
VRTX D 5.64%
AMGN F 5.11%
ALNY D 4.95%
CRNX C 4.0%
BBIO F 3.69%
CYTK F 3.47%
BSX A 2.99%
ASND F 2.88%
MIRM B 2.6%
DXCM C 2.57%
MREO F 2.49%
IONS F 2.42%
MASI B 2.39%
REGN F 2.37%
KROS D 2.1%
EW C 1.91%
MLYS F 1.89%
PODD C 1.88%
RCKT F 1.8%
ARWR D 1.76%
RARE F 1.71%
NTLA F 1.66%
MDGL B 1.46%
AKRO B 1.28%
NVS F 1.26%
VKTX F 1.14%
NARI C 0.97%
EWTX C 0.96%
SLN F 0.91%
TERN F 0.7%
VERV F 0.64%
TNYA D 0.43%
RANI F 0.31%
HRTS Underweight 63 Positions Relative to NOBL
Symbol Grade Weight
EMR B -1.81%
GPC D -1.67%
CINF A -1.67%
ALB B -1.66%
DOV A -1.65%
BEN C -1.64%
FAST B -1.64%
GWW B -1.64%
CHD A -1.63%
PNR A -1.62%
CVX A -1.62%
CAH B -1.62%
TROW B -1.61%
CLX A -1.61%
ITW B -1.6%
NUE C -1.58%
TGT F -1.58%
BRO B -1.58%
KVUE A -1.57%
CTAS B -1.57%
SHW B -1.57%
ADP A -1.56%
ATO A -1.56%
CHRW B -1.56%
SPGI C -1.55%
WMT A -1.54%
ROP B -1.54%
APD A -1.54%
NDSN B -1.54%
SYY D -1.54%
XOM B -1.53%
EXPD C -1.53%
PG C -1.53%
ABT B -1.53%
AFL B -1.52%
LOW C -1.52%
ESS B -1.52%
KMB C -1.51%
CAT B -1.51%
FRT B -1.5%
CB C -1.49%
PPG F -1.47%
ECL D -1.46%
MCD D -1.46%
IBM C -1.45%
MKC C -1.44%
CL D -1.44%
GD D -1.44%
SJM D -1.43%
LIN C -1.43%
JNJ C -1.43%
HRL D -1.43%
BDX F -1.42%
AOS F -1.41%
ADM D -1.41%
NEE C -1.4%
AMCR C -1.39%
KO D -1.39%
PEP F -1.39%
ED C -1.37%
O C -1.36%
ABBV F -1.33%
SWK D -1.28%
Compare ETFs