HELX vs. DEEP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) to Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP)
HELX

Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF

HELX Description

Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies related to genomic-based technologies designed to enhance the quality of life. Provides access to companies benefitting from or facilitating the use of new research including DNA sequencing, gene editing and personalized medicine Uses bottom-up fundamental research conducted by dedicated, industry-specific analysts to identify disruptive business models at the right stage for investment Actively managed by a seasoned portfolio management team that is based in Silicon Valley and has a long history of investing in the craft of innovation

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.53

Average Daily Volume

2,580

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

DEEP Description The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Acquirers Deep Value Index (the “index”). The index was established in 2020 by Acquirers Funds LLC and tracks the performance of a portfolio of 20 of the most undervalued, fundamentally strong stocks drawn from the largest 500 stocks listed in the United States meeting certain liquidity thresholds. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.59

Average Daily Volume

3,114

Number of Holdings *

96

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period HELX DEEP
30 Days -5.99% 4.48%
60 Days -10.44% 1.76%
90 Days -11.92% 1.07%
12 Months 6.42% 11.99%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in HELX Weight in DEEP Overlap
HELX Overweight 53 Positions Relative to DEEP
Symbol Grade Weight
VRTX D 5.94%
KRYS C 4.7%
NTRA A 4.64%
LLY F 4.63%
REGN F 4.3%
MEDP D 4.07%
TMO F 4.01%
DHR F 3.99%
UTHR C 2.75%
AZN F 2.34%
CDNS B 2.34%
CTVA C 2.29%
CRL D 2.23%
BNTX C 2.21%
A D 2.11%
IONS F 2.1%
INSM C 2.08%
RVTY F 2.01%
ALNY D 1.98%
QGEN D 1.96%
BRKR D 1.94%
SRPT F 1.5%
RARE F 1.46%
RCKT F 1.42%
TWST F 1.27%
LGND C 1.27%
ICLR D 1.25%
EXAS D 1.2%
LH B 1.15%
IQV F 1.08%
RGEN D 1.08%
BEAM D 1.03%
TECH F 1.01%
VYGR F 0.99%
AZTA D 0.95%
NBIX C 0.94%
BBIO F 0.91%
RXRX F 0.69%
MRNA F 0.66%
BIO C 0.59%
VCYT B 0.56%
DVAX C 0.53%
NTLA F 0.51%
DOCS C 0.51%
CDMO A 0.51%
CRSP D 0.5%
AVTR F 0.46%
BMY B 0.36%
CRNX C 0.25%
BMRN F 0.2%
ARE F 0.15%
SLP D 0.11%
FDMT F 0.1%
HELX Underweight 96 Positions Relative to DEEP
Symbol Grade Weight
SMLR B -1.87%
IGIC B -1.29%
BMRC B -1.25%
PGC B -1.25%
ARCH B -1.24%
RYI C -1.21%
HSII B -1.18%
METC C -1.18%
PRDO B -1.16%
NATR C -1.15%
HCKT B -1.14%
MCFT C -1.13%
PFBC B -1.13%
BSIG A -1.13%
RCMT C -1.13%
NRP B -1.12%
TTEC F -1.12%
BBW C -1.11%
BHLB B -1.1%
GPRK C -1.1%
VSTO A -1.1%
VBTX B -1.1%
BXC B -1.09%
PLPC B -1.09%
BKE B -1.09%
DXLG D -1.08%
HELE C -1.08%
AMCX C -1.07%
HLF C -1.07%
EPM A -1.06%
INMD C -1.06%
NX C -1.06%
UPBD B -1.05%
DMLP A -1.05%
PLAB C -1.04%
DAC C -1.04%
MBUU B -1.03%
XPEL B -1.03%
HTBK B -1.03%
DHIL B -1.03%
SBH C -1.02%
AMPY C -1.02%
UAN B -1.02%
ITRN B -1.02%
WGO C -1.02%
WINA C -1.02%
OFLX D -1.02%
LPRO B -1.01%
DHT F -0.99%
WLKP A -0.99%
NUS D -0.99%
UTMD F -0.98%
IMKTA C -0.98%
USNA C -0.98%
SMP C -0.98%
WTI F -0.97%
INVA D -0.97%
WNC C -0.97%
MED D -0.97%
MOV D -0.97%
NVEC B -0.96%
GIII D -0.96%
SD D -0.95%
SWBI C -0.95%
TH C -0.94%
KFRC D -0.93%
IIIN C -0.92%
WRLD C -0.92%
FF F -0.92%
PARR F -0.92%
RGR F -0.91%
IRWD F -0.9%
ETD C -0.9%
LESL D -0.9%
RMAX C -0.89%
LEGH D -0.89%
RMR F -0.88%
JOUT F -0.87%
DFIN D -0.87%
NRC F -0.86%
ODP F -0.85%
JBSS F -0.85%
RGP F -0.84%
HZO F -0.83%
GIC D -0.82%
HVT D -0.79%
MYE F -0.79%
CRCT F -0.78%
LPG F -0.78%
HOV D -0.77%
CLFD F -0.74%
SIGA F -0.72%
HDSN F -0.72%
ASC F -0.67%
CCRN F -0.66%
AMN F -0.52%
Compare ETFs