GSST vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)

GSST

Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF

GSST Description

The investment seeks to provide current income with preservation of capital. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes (measured at the time of purchase) ("Net Assets") in a broad range of U.S. dollar denominated bonds. It will concentrate its investments in the financial services group of industries. Under normal circumstances, the fund's effective duration is expected to be one year or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.08

Average Daily Volume

74,056

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.03

Average Daily Volume

65,198

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GSST	PGJ
30 Days	0.36%	-0.28%
60 Days	0.83%	-1.38%
90 Days	1.15%	10.51%
12 Months	4.97%	-0.33%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in GSST	Weight in PGJ	Overlap
	BABA	C	0.16%	8.06%	0.16%

GSST Overweight 62 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	A	0.88%
CI	A	0.72%
DFS	B	0.64%
NVR	D	0.64%
CCEP	A	0.59%
FN	D	0.49%
SO	A	0.48%
T	B	0.46%
BMO	C	0.45%
PXD	A	0.44%
KIND	B	0.44%
HSBC	A	0.43%
CM	C	0.43%
PSA	D	0.43%
VZ	C	0.4%
JXN	A	0.4%
BNS	D	0.37%
MS	A	0.37%
UBS	D	0.36%
BAC	A	0.35%
DTE	A	0.35%
EQH	A	0.35%
BIIB	C	0.34%
R	A	0.33%
ICE	C	0.31%
SCHW	A	0.31%
TD	D	0.31%
CNP	A	0.27%
DUK	A	0.26%
RY	C	0.25%
DLTR	F	0.25%
FIS	D	0.25%
GILD	F	0.23%
AIG	A	0.23%
MMM	A	0.22%
C	A	0.22%
CRPT	D	0.2%
MKL	B	0.19%
PL	F	0.19%
PPL	A	0.19%
AEP	A	0.19%
ETR	A	0.18%
NWG	A	0.17%
MPLX	A	0.16%
FITB	A	0.15%
NEE	A	0.15%
CSL	A	0.14%
ROP	D	0.14%
ATO	A	0.13%
RL	D	0.13%
MPC	B	0.13%
MCO	C	0.13%
HPE	D	0.13%
AL	A	0.11%
PFG	C	0.11%
ABBV	D	0.1%
GM	A	0.1%
COMM	F	0.1%
VOYA	B	0.08%
OGE	A	0.07%
GNR	A	0.05%
BX	D	0.03%

GSST Underweight 50 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TCOM	A	-8.59%
YUMC	F	-7.33%
BIDU	C	-7.16%
NTES	D	-6.17%
JD	A	-5.04%
TME	A	-4.74%
ZTO	B	-4.42%
BEKE	A	-4.06%
HTHT	B	-3.75%
VIPS	F	-3.42%
BZ	A	-3.39%
YMM	A	-3.13%
NIO	D	-2.94%
TAL	D	-2.92%
LI	D	-2.29%
QFIN	A	-1.59%
IQ	A	-1.38%
ATHM	D	-1.01%
DQ	F	-1.0%
MNSO	A	-0.97%
HOLI	D	-0.92%
XPEV	F	-0.88%
BILI	B	-0.84%
RLX	B	-0.79%
ATAT	F	-0.65%
GOTU	D	-0.6%
MOMO	C	-0.6%
CSIQ	F	-0.59%
FINV	B	-0.56%
JKS	D	-0.53%
WB	B	-0.46%
ZLAB	F	-0.45%
EH	B	-0.4%
GDS	B	-0.35%
QD	C	-0.28%
TIGR	D	-0.26%
NOAH	B	-0.25%
HUYA	A	-0.25%
SOHU	A	-0.23%
KC	D	-0.14%
LX	D	-0.14%
CAN	F	-0.13%
TUYA	D	-0.13%
VNET	D	-0.13%
DADA	F	-0.13%
API	D	-0.12%
ZH	D	-0.11%
DDL	D	-0.1%
IMAB	F	-0.08%
DAO	F	-0.08%