ESGX vs. NBSM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF (ESGX) to Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM)
ESGX

Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF

ESGX Description

ESGX invests in US-listed companies determined to have high shareholder value, unencumbered by ESG restrictions, such as political stances or conforming to a greater social goal of stakeholder capitalism. Using a proprietary methodology, the fund assigns stocks with shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The shareholder value creation score considers information on corporate donations, advocacy, activities, and policies gathered from different data sources. The financial metrics score separately calculates a securitys one-year and five-year price performance, closing price, cash, revenue, debt-to-equity ratio, average dividend yield, profit margin, and market capitalization. Companies are ranked according to the highest shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The fund selects and weights 50 companies from the resulting sets of filtered companies. The index is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.79

Average Daily Volume

101

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.37

Average Daily Volume

11,663

Number of Holdings *

46

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ESGX NBSM
30 Days -0.71% 4.00%
60 Days 0.93% 4.33%
90 Days 4.56%
12 Months
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ESGX Weight in NBSM Overlap
MANH D 1.97% 1.16% 1.16%
RLI A 2.33% 2.33% 2.33%
ROL B 2.02% 1.46% 1.46%
TYL B 2.4% 2.72% 2.4%
ESGX Overweight 45 Positions Relative to NBSM
Symbol Grade Weight
GTLS A 2.58%
WST C 2.51%
VTRS B 2.37%
SEIC B 2.33%
NWS B 2.33%
VNO C 2.3%
GEF A 2.27%
TPX B 2.26%
JBHT C 2.24%
EVRG A 2.21%
PNR A 2.19%
SLGN A 2.17%
VRSN C 2.16%
SYY D 2.14%
IBOC B 2.11%
EHC B 2.1%
FFIV B 2.08%
KIM A 2.07%
SYNA C 2.06%
PNW A 2.06%
TDY B 2.05%
DCI B 2.04%
DXCM C 2.02%
RVTY F 1.95%
KEYS A 1.92%
FRT B 1.91%
LKQ F 1.88%
HST C 1.88%
MAA B 1.85%
STE D 1.82%
POOL C 1.82%
CNP A 1.81%
SWKS F 1.81%
O C 1.75%
GPC D 1.74%
POST C 1.73%
WEX D 1.7%
MCHP F 1.69%
KNSL B 1.67%
EGP D 1.67%
BCO F 1.54%
LNTH D 1.52%
HII F 1.45%
QRVO F 1.19%
ENPH F 1.09%
ESGX Underweight 42 Positions Relative to NBSM
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B -4.27%
EXP B -3.88%
KEX B -3.67%
WSO A -3.19%
ITT A -3.11%
VMI B -3.11%
RYAN A -3.08%
ATR B -2.93%
RBC A -2.92%
HAE C -2.9%
CNX A -2.68%
TTEK F -2.46%
CHE D -2.41%
CBU B -2.21%
MKSI C -2.17%
TTC C -2.12%
CR A -2.09%
GGG B -2.04%
LFUS D -1.99%
LECO C -1.99%
TXRH B -1.94%
ENTG D -1.88%
CFR B -1.86%
TECH F -1.81%
NXST C -1.77%
LSCC D -1.77%
POWI F -1.59%
TDW F -1.59%
PB B -1.59%
TSCO D -1.59%
BSY F -1.54%
SPSC D -1.51%
CHD A -1.51%
LNT A -1.49%
SSD F -1.37%
ICLR D -1.21%
IBP D -1.15%
BFAM D -1.14%
FND D -1.09%
AWI A -1.04%
CNM D -0.99%
CVLT B -0.51%
Compare ETFs