ECML vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)

ECML

EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

ECML Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in U.S. equity securities that the sub-adviser believes are under-valued and under-appreciated by the market. The sub-adviser employs a quantitative and systematic approach to long-term investing. It is expected that the fund will generally hold 60 to 70 stocks that are selected from a universe that includes all publicly traded stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the Nasdaq Market ("Nasdaq").

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.74

Average Daily Volume

1,188

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.48

Average Daily Volume

9,674

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ECML	ERTH
30 Days	7.29%	-0.65%
60 Days	4.81%	-4.93%
90 Days	5.05%	-3.45%
12 Months	27.68%	-2.65%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in ECML	Weight in ERTH	Overlap
	KBH	D	1.67%	1.38%	1.38%
	MTH	D	1.4%	1.53%	1.4%

ECML Overweight 58 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MLI	C	2.27%
ALSN	B	2.24%
CALM	A	2.21%
HSII	B	2.11%
TOL	B	1.95%
GPI	A	1.86%
PRDO	B	1.84%
CEIX	A	1.83%
PPC	C	1.83%
FOXA	B	1.82%
LNG	B	1.81%
TMHC	B	1.78%
OVV	B	1.77%
INGR	B	1.76%
SM	B	1.75%
GRBK	D	1.74%
MO	A	1.72%
OSK	B	1.7%
EOG	A	1.69%
OC	A	1.69%
STLD	B	1.69%
PHM	D	1.68%
DDS	B	1.67%
SANM	B	1.65%
GIII	D	1.65%
ARCH	B	1.65%
CMC	B	1.64%
COP	C	1.64%
SIRI	C	1.62%
VLO	C	1.6%
TPH	D	1.6%
COKE	C	1.6%
HCC	B	1.58%
PCAR	B	1.58%
MHO	D	1.58%
ATKR	C	1.55%
HESM	B	1.54%
CF	B	1.54%
AMR	C	1.53%
TEX	D	1.51%
LEN	D	1.51%
BCC	B	1.51%
DVN	F	1.5%
AN	C	1.48%
MPC	D	1.48%
NUE	C	1.48%
ANDE	D	1.47%
PLAB	C	1.46%
DINO	D	1.45%
DHI	D	1.43%
IMKTA	C	1.43%
LBRT	D	1.41%
BG	F	1.41%
ARW	D	1.29%
MOH	F	1.29%
INSW	F	1.22%
LPG	F	1.17%
FOR	F	1.16%

ECML Underweight 38 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSLA	B	-7.03%
DLR	B	-5.84%
NVDA	C	-5.76%
FSLR	F	-4.43%
LI	F	-3.17%
WMS	D	-2.13%
ENPH	F	-2.01%
XPEV	C	-1.85%
RIVN	F	-1.77%
VNO	B	-1.58%
BMI	B	-1.55%
DAR	C	-1.54%
NIO	F	-1.52%
WFG	D	-1.2%
CUZ	B	-1.12%
ORA	B	-1.04%
DEI	B	-0.75%
LCID	F	-0.58%
RUN	F	-0.56%
NEP	F	-0.37%
PLUG	F	-0.36%
AAT	B	-0.34%
ARRY	C	-0.27%
ERII	D	-0.25%
BZH	B	-0.23%
BDN	C	-0.21%
PGRE	F	-0.21%
SHLS	F	-0.2%
REX	D	-0.17%
SEDG	F	-0.17%
JKS	F	-0.16%
CHPT	F	-0.1%
RDUS	C	-0.1%
TUYA	F	-0.08%
AMPS	C	-0.07%
MNTK	F	-0.06%
MERC	F	-0.06%
RENB	F	-0.05%