EATZ vs. QLTY ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.00
Average Daily Volume
1,821
21
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
QLTY Description
QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$31.74
Average Daily Volume
245,255
34
Performance
| Period | EATZ | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.11% | -1.79% |
| 60 Days | 6.29% | -1.00% |
| 90 Days | 14.05% | 4.34% |
| 12 Months | 41.82% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in QLTY | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARMK | B | 4.83% | 2.53% | 2.53% |
EATZ Overweight 20 Positions Relative to QLTY
EATZ Underweight 33 Positions Relative to QLTY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | D | -6.6% | |
| AAPL | C | -5.31% | |
| ORCL | B | -4.91% | |
| META | B | -4.38% | |
| JNJ | D | -4.15% | |
| GOOGL | A | -4.14% | |
| UNH | C | -3.62% | |
| ABT | A | -3.6% | |
| TXN | A | -3.46% | |
| KO | D | -3.43% | |
| ACN | C | -3.27% | |
| PG | D | -3.24% | |
| KLAC | F | -3.21% | |
| ELV | F | -3.1% | |
| LRCX | F | -3.02% | |
| V | A | -2.95% | |
| ISRG | B | -2.75% | |
| CRM | A | -2.58% | |
| MRK | F | -2.58% | |
| TJX | D | -2.44% | |
| AMZN | A | -2.31% | |
| OTIS | B | -2.3% | |
| AVGO | B | -2.13% | |
| USB | B | -2.11% | |
| HLT | A | -2.08% | |
| WFC | B | -2.06% | |
| GE | D | -1.86% | |
| MDLZ | D | -1.78% | |
| STZ | F | -1.7% | |
| LLY | F | -1.67% | |
| CI | D | -1.58% | |
| DGX | B | -1.3% | |
| TMO | D | -0.99% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QLTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
