EATZ vs. DIVP ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.00
Average Daily Volume
1,821
21
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
DIVP Description
DIVP invests in large- and mid-cap value stocks that generally have higher dividend yield than the average of the funds US benchmark. The fund identifies value stocks that have low price-to-earnings ratio with above-average earnings and dividend growth potential. Companies are screened using fundamental research. The fund may invest up to 30% in non-US companies in the form of ADRs. While the portfolio is not rebalanced systematically, weighting is roughly equal to avoid overweighting of individual securities. To generate additional income, the fund selectively writes covered call options with a target range of between 25-40%. However, the covered call overlay limits participation in potential gains if shares increase in value. The adviser may sell stocks that are no longer viewed as attractive based on growth potential, dividend yield, or price. As an actively managed ETF, the fund manager has full discretion to make buy, hold, or sell decisions at any time.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.25
Average Daily Volume
1,461
32
Performance
| Period | EATZ | DIVP |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.11% | -1.04% |
| 60 Days | 6.29% | -0.27% |
| 90 Days | 14.05% | 4.23% |
| 12 Months | 41.82% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in DIVP | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYY | D | 4.49% | 2.88% | 2.88% |
EATZ Overweight 20 Positions Relative to DIVP
EATZ Underweight 31 Positions Relative to DIVP
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | B | -4.27% | |
| MDT | B | -4.07% | |
| EOG | D | -4.0% | |
| VICI | D | -3.98% | |
| DUK | C | -3.83% | |
| BMY | A | -3.68% | |
| PM | A | -3.56% | |
| PPL | C | -3.53% | |
| CAG | D | -3.45% | |
| MRK | F | -3.33% | |
| VZ | D | -3.29% | |
| CVX | A | -3.23% | |
| KVUE | B | -3.17% | |
| XOM | C | -3.17% | |
| TFC | C | -3.11% | |
| BAC | B | -3.07% | |
| C | A | -3.07% | |
| CMCSA | A | -3.07% | |
| BAX | F | -3.07% | |
| DOC | C | -3.07% | |
| RTX | C | -3.02% | |
| IBM | C | -2.71% | |
| MO | A | -2.44% | |
| DOW | F | -2.38% | |
| JCI | B | -2.29% | |
| JPM | A | -2.22% | |
| TRV | B | -2.19% | |
| GD | C | -2.07% | |
| RIO | B | -1.92% | |
| UPS | C | -1.81% | |
| GPC | F | -1.64% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
DIVP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
