DURA vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)

DURA

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF

DURA Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Morningstar® US Dividend Valuation IndexSM (the "index"). The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities that comprise the fund's benchmark index. The index is comprised of securities of companies with a high dividend yield, strong financial health and an attractive uncertainty-adjusted valuation. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.96

Average Daily Volume

4,932

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.52

Average Daily Volume

262,121

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	DURA	QLTY
30 Days	0.92%	1.37%
60 Days	1.56%	0.43%
90 Days	3.32%	2.26%
12 Months	18.56%	26.44%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in DURA	Weight in QLTY	Overlap
DGX	A	0.2%	1.35%	0.2%
JNJ	D	4.4%	4.24%	4.24%
MDLZ	F	1.22%	1.72%	1.22%
MRK	F	3.97%	2.41%	2.41%

DURA Overweight 80 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
XOM	B	5.39%
CVX	A	5.32%
ABBV	D	4.15%
PFE	D	4.13%
MO	A	4.11%
PEP	F	3.97%
CMCSA	B	3.16%
MCD	D	2.91%
UPS	C	2.88%
AMGN	D	2.58%
COP	C	2.2%
QCOM	F	2.13%
MDT	D	2.08%
RTX	C	2.01%
HON	B	1.94%
CME	A	1.93%
BX	A	1.85%
DUK	C	1.84%
KMI	A	1.75%
OKE	A	1.64%
ADP	B	1.48%
EOG	A	1.38%
PRU	A	1.22%
DOW	F	1.05%
APD	A	1.05%
SRE	A	1.04%
EMR	A	0.92%
KMB	D	0.9%
EXC	C	0.87%
GD	F	0.84%
VLO	C	0.83%
PAYX	C	0.81%
KHC	F	0.77%
XEL	A	0.76%
TROW	B	0.74%
EIX	B	0.7%
GIS	D	0.7%
ETR	B	0.7%
MTB	A	0.67%
BKR	B	0.66%
WEC	A	0.64%
RF	A	0.63%
LHX	C	0.6%
ES	D	0.52%
ADM	D	0.49%
FE	C	0.48%
DTE	C	0.48%
AEE	A	0.46%
PPL	B	0.46%
YUM	B	0.44%
HSY	F	0.43%
DD	D	0.39%
EVRG	A	0.38%
CLX	B	0.36%
PPG	F	0.36%
CAG	D	0.35%
EBAY	D	0.33%
TSN	B	0.33%
NI	A	0.3%
LNT	A	0.29%
EQT	B	0.28%
SJM	D	0.26%
EMN	D	0.23%
OGE	B	0.22%
SWKS	F	0.22%
APA	D	0.2%
RPRX	D	0.19%
WTRG	B	0.19%
IVZ	B	0.18%
DINO	D	0.18%
WU	D	0.17%
JHG	A	0.15%
POR	C	0.12%
CE	F	0.11%
HII	D	0.1%
NJR	A	0.1%
AGR	B	0.08%
THO	B	0.07%
FHI	A	0.07%
XRAY	F	0.05%

DURA Underweight 30 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSFT	F	-6.46%
AAPL	C	-5.33%
ORCL	B	-4.71%
META	D	-4.5%
GOOGL	C	-4.43%
ABT	B	-4.17%
UNH	C	-3.62%
TXN	C	-3.53%
ACN	C	-3.3%
V	A	-3.22%
PG	A	-3.2%
ISRG	A	-2.92%
KLAC	D	-2.85%
LRCX	F	-2.85%
CRM	B	-2.84%
KO	D	-2.81%
HLT	A	-2.62%
ARMK	B	-2.56%
ELV	F	-2.5%
WFC	A	-2.45%
AVGO	D	-2.45%
AMZN	C	-2.4%
USB	A	-2.31%
OTIS	C	-2.25%
TJX	A	-2.14%
GE	D	-1.73%
LLY	F	-1.61%
STZ	D	-1.59%
CI	F	-1.49%
TMO	F	-0.91%